Describe the longitudinal national epidemiology of tracheostomies performed in acute care hospitals and describe the annual rate of tracheostomy performed for patients with respiratory failure with invasive mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional study. Setting: The 2002-2014 and 2016-2017 Healthcare Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample datasets. Patients: Discharges greater than or equal to 18 years old, excluding those with head and neck cancer or transferred from another hospital. We used diagnostic and procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revisions to define cases of respiratory failure, invasive mechanical ventilation, and tracheostomy. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: There were an estimated 80,612 tracheostomies performed in 2002, a peak of 89,545 tracheostomies in 2008, and a nadir of 58,840 tracheostomies in 2017. The annual occurrence rate was 37.5 (95% CI, 34.7-40.4) tracheostomies per 100,000 U.S. adults in 2002, with a peak of 39.7 (95% CI, 36.5-42.9) in 2003, and with a nadir of 28.4 (95% CI, 27.2-29.6) in 2017. Specifically, among the subgroup of hospital discharges with respiratory failure with invasive mechanical ventilation, an annual average of 9.6% received tracheostomy in the hospital. This changed over the study period from 10.4% in 2002, with a peak of 10.9% in 2004, and with a nadir of 7.4% in 2017. Among respiratory failure with invasive mechanical ventilation discharges with tracheostomy, the annual proportion of patients 50-59 and 60-69 years old increased, whereas patients from 70 to 79 and greater than or equal to 80 years old decreased. The mean hospital length of stay decreased, and in-hospital mortality decreased, whereas discharge to intermediate care facilities increased. Conclusions: Over the study period, there were decreases in the annual total case volume and adult occurrence rate of tracheostomy as well as decreases in the rate of tracheostomy among the subgroup with respiratory failure with invasive mechanical ventilation. There is some evidence of changing patterns of patient selection for in-hospital tracheostomy among those with respiratory failure with invasive mechanical ventilation with decreasing proportions of patients with advanced age.

Objective: To assess feasibility of modified protocol during percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic era. Design: A retrospective review of cohort who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy with modified protocol. Settings: Medical, surgical, and neurologic ICUs. Subjects: Patients admitted in medical, surgical, and neurologic units with prolonged need of mechanical ventilation or inability to liberate from the ventilator. Interventions: A detailed protocol was written. Steps were defined to be performed before apnea and during apnea. A feasibility study of 28 patients was conducted. The key aerosol-generating portions of the procedure were performed with the ventilator switched to standby mode with the patient apneic. Measurements and Main Results: Data including patient demographics, primary diagnosis, age, body mass index, and duration of apnea time during the tracheostomy were collected. Average ventilator standby time (apnea) during the procedure was 238 seconds (3.96 min) with range 149 seconds (2.48 min) to 340 seconds (5.66 min). Single-use (disposable) bronchoscopes (Ambu A/S [Ballerup, Denmark] or Glidescope [Verathon, Inc., Bothell, WA]) were used during all procedures except in nine. No desaturation events occurred during any procedure. Conclusions: Percutaneous tracheostomy performed with apnea protocol may help minimize aerosolization, reducing risk of exposure of coronavirus disease 2019 to staff. It can be safely performed with portable bronchoscopes to limit staff and minimize the surfaces requiring disinfection post procedure.

OBJECTIVES:: Measurements of extravascular lung water (EVLW) correlate to the degree of pulmonary edema and have substantial prognostic information in critically ill patients. Prior studies using single indicator thermodilution have reported that 21% to 35% of patients with clinical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have normal EVLW (<10 mL/kg). Given that lung size is independent of actual body weight, we sought to determine whether indexing EVLW to predicted or adjusted body weight affects the frequency of increased EVLW in patients with ARDS. DESIGN:: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING:: Medical and surgical intensive care units at two academic hospitals. PATIENTS:: Thirty patients within 72 hrs of meeting American-European Consensus Conference definition of ARDS and 14 severe sepsis patients without ARDS. INTERVENTIONS:: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS:: EVLW was measured for 7 days by PiCCO transpulmonary thermodilution; 225 measurements of EVLW indexed to actual body weight (ActBW) were compared with EVLW indexed to predicted body weight (PBW) and adjusted body weight (AdjBW). Mean EVLW indexed to ActBW was 12.7 mg/kg for ARDS patients and 7.8 mg/kg for non-ARDS sepsis patients (p < .0001). In all patients, EVLW increased an average of 1.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg when indexed to AdjBW and 2.0 ± 4.1 mL/kg when indexed to PBW. Indexing EVLW to PBW or AdjBW increased the proportion of ARDS patients with elevated EVLW (each p < .05) without increasing the frequency of elevated EVLW in non-ARDS patients. EVLW indexed to PBW had a stronger correlation to Lung Injury Score (r = .39 vs. r = .17) and Pao2/Fio2 ratio (r = .25 vs. r = .10) than did EVLW indexed to ActBW. CONCLUSIONS:: Indexing EVLW to PBW or AdjBW reduces the number of ARDS patients with normal EVLW and correlates better to Lung Injury Score and oxygenation than using ActBW. Studies are needed to confirm the presumed superiority of this method for diagnosing ARDS and to determine the clinical treatment implications.

Background: Pulmonary edema is a cardinal feature of the life-threatening condition known as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Patients with chronic alcohol abuse are known to be at increased risk of developing and dying from ARDS. Based upon preclinical data, we hypothesized that a history of chronic alcohol abuse in ARDS patients is associated with greater quantities and slower resolution of pulmonary edema compared with ARDS patients without a history of alcohol abuse. Methods: A PiCCO™ transpulmonary thermodilution catheter was inserted into 35 patients within 72 hours of meeting American European Consensus Criteria definition of ARDS. Pulmonary edema was quantified as extravascular lung water (EVLW) and measured for up to 7 days in 13 patients with a history of chronic alcohol abuse and 22 patients without a history of chronic alcohol abuse. Results: Mean EVLW was higher in patients with a history of chronic alcohol abuse (16.6 vs. 10.5 ml/kg, p < 0.0001). Patients with alcohol abuse had significantly greater EVLW over the duration of the study (RM-ANOVA p = 0.003). There was a trend towards slower resolution of EVLW in patients with a history of alcohol abuse (a decrease of 0.5 ml/kg vs. 2.4 ml/kg, p = 0.17) over the study period. A history of alcohol abuse conferred a greater than 3-fold increased risk of elevated EVLW [OR 3.16, (1.26 to 7.93)] using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: In patients who develop ARDS, alcohol abuse is associated with greater levels EVLW and a trend towards slower resolution of EVLW. Combined with mechanistic and preclinical evidence linking chronic alcohol consumption and ARDS, targeted therapies should be developed for these patients.

OBJECTIVES: Timing of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 has attracted substantial attention. Initial guidelines recommended delaying or avoiding tracheostomy due to the potential for particle aerosolization and theoretical risk to providers. However, early tracheostomy could improve patient outcomes and alleviate resource shortages. This study compares outcomes in a diverse population of hospitalized COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy either "early"(within 14 d of intubation) or "late"(more than 14 d after intubation). DESIGN: International multi-institute retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Thirteen hospitals in Bolivia, Brazil, Spain, and the United States. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 undergoing early or late tracheostomy between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 549 patients from 13 hospitals in four countries were included in the final analysis. Multivariable regression analysis showed that early tracheostomy was associated with a 12-day decrease in time on mechanical ventilation (95% CI, -16 to -8; p < 0.001). Further, ICU and hospital lengths of stay in patients undergoing early tracheostomy were 15 days (95% CI, -23 to -9 d; p < 0.001) and 22 days (95% CI, -31 to -12 d) shorter, respectively. In contrast, early tracheostomy patients experienced lower risk-adjusted survival at 30-day post-admission (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Differences in 90-day post-admission survival were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients undergoing tracheostomy within 14 days of intubation have reduced ventilator dependence as well as reduced lengths of stay. However, early tracheostomy patients experienced lower 30-day survival. Future efforts should identify patients most likely to benefit from early tracheostomy while accounting for location-specific capacity.

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to discuss the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pulmonary procedures, including new guidelines, restrictions, techniques, and overall effect on patient care. Recent Findings: SARS-CoV-2 predominately impacts the pulmonary system and can result in a severe lower respiratory tract infection. Early guidelines based largely on data from the SARS epidemic recommended significant restrictions on procedure volume out of concern for healthcare worker safety. Newer data suggests relative safety in performing airway and pleural procedures as long as appropriate precautions are followed and new techniques are utilized. The introduction of effective vaccines and more reliable testing has led to a re-expansion of elective procedures. Summary: Many guidelines and expert statements exist for the management and practice of pulmonary procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. A flexible and individualized approach may be necessary as our understanding of COVID-19 continues to evolve.

Broncholithiasis and bronchoesophageal fistulae (BEF) are rare events, with broncholithiasis occurring in 0.1%−0.2% of respiratory disease patients,1 and acquired fistulae rarer still. Management can have potentially life-threatening complications, including major artery and esophageal lacerations. Furthermore, bronchoesophageal fistulae, if stented, are commonly stented from the esophagus.2 We present a case of bronchoesophageal fistula that was repaired by a combination of fibrin sealant and a covered stent, which shows a novel management approach.

OBJECTIVES:: Measurements of extravascular lung water (EVLW) correlate to the degree of pulmonary edema and have substantial prognostic information in critically ill patients. Prior studies using single indicator thermodilution have reported that 21% to 35% of patients with clinical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have normal EVLW (<10 mL/kg). Given that lung size is independent of actual body weight, we sought to determine whether indexing EVLW to predicted or adjusted body weight affects the frequency of increased EVLW in patients with ARDS. DESIGN:: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING:: Medical and surgical intensive care units at two academic hospitals. PATIENTS:: Thirty patients within 72 hrs of meeting American-European Consensus Conference definition of ARDS and 14 severe sepsis patients without ARDS. INTERVENTIONS:: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS:: EVLW was measured for 7 days by PiCCO transpulmonary thermodilution; 225 measurements of EVLW indexed to actual body weight (ActBW) were compared with EVLW indexed to predicted body weight (PBW) and adjusted body weight (AdjBW). Mean EVLW indexed to ActBW was 12.7 mg/kg for ARDS patients and 7.8 mg/kg for non-ARDS sepsis patients (p < .0001). In all patients, EVLW increased an average of 1.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg when indexed to AdjBW and 2.0 ± 4.1 mL/kg when indexed to PBW. Indexing EVLW to PBW or AdjBW increased the proportion of ARDS patients with elevated EVLW (each p < .05) without increasing the frequency of elevated EVLW in non-ARDS patients. EVLW indexed to PBW had a stronger correlation to Lung Injury Score (r = .39 vs. r = .17) and Pao2/Fio2 ratio (r = .25 vs. r = .10) than did EVLW indexed to ActBW. CONCLUSIONS:: Indexing EVLW to PBW or AdjBW reduces the number of ARDS patients with normal EVLW and correlates better to Lung Injury Score and oxygenation than using ActBW. Studies are needed to confirm the presumed superiority of this method for diagnosing ARDS and to determine the clinical treatment implications.