Introduction: The impact of blood storage on red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization remains controversial, with some studies suggesting enhancement of RBC-induced alloantibody production and others failing to observe any impact of storage on alloantibody formation. Since evaluation of storage on RBC alloimmunization in patients has examined antibody formation against a broad range of alloantigens, it remains possible that different clinical outcomes reflect a variable impact of storage on alloimmunization to specific antigens. Methods: RBCs expressing two distinct model antigens, HEL-OVA-Duffy (HOD) and KEL, separately or together (HOD × KEL), were stored for 0, 8, or 14 days, followed by detection of antigen levels prior to transfusion. Transfused donor RBC survival was assessed within 24 h of transfusion, while IgM and IgG antibody production were assessed 5 and 14 days after transfusion. Results: Stored HOD or KEL RBCs retained similar HEL or KEL antigen levels, respectively, as fresh RBCs, but did exhibit enhanced RBC clearance with increased storage age. Storage enhanced IgG antibody formation against HOD, while the oppositive outcome occurred following transfusion of stored KEL RBCs. The distinct impact of storage on HOD or KEL alloimmunization did not appear to reflect intrinsic differences between HOD or KEL RBCs, as transfusion of stored HOD × KEL RBCs resulted in increased IgG anti-HOD antibody development and reduced IgG anti-KEL antibody formation. Conclusions: These data demonstrate a dichotomous impact of storage on immunization to distinct RBC antigens, offering a possible explanation for inconsistent clinical experience and the need for additional studies on the relationship between RBC storage and alloimmunization.

Reports of thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19 are increasingly prominent, and these reports include patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation.1, 2 At our institution, multiple occurrences of anticoagulation failure prompted us to search for alternative aetiologies contributing to refractory hypercoagulability. Here we describe COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity, a potentially severe consequence of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, in 15 patients tested to date. This work was done ethically in accordance with institutional review board approval.

Anti-factor VIII (fVIII) alloantibodies, which can develop in patients with hemophilia A, limit the therapeutic options and increase morbidity and mortality of these patients. However, the factors that influence anti-fVIII antibody development remain incompletely understood. Recent studies suggest that Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs) may facilitate recognition and uptake of fVIII by recently developed or pre-existing naturally occurring anti-fVIII antibodies, providing a mechanism whereby the immune system may recognize fVIII following infusion. However, the role of FcγRs in anti-fVIII antibody formation remains unknown. In order to define the influence of FcγRs on the development of anti-fVIII antibodies, fVIII was injected into WT or FcγR knockout recipients, followed by evaluation of anti-fVIII antibodies. Anti-fVIII antibodies were readily observed following fVIII injection into FcγR knockouts, with similar anti-fVIII antibody levels occurring in FcγR knockouts as detected in WT mice injected in parallel. As antibodies can also fix complement, providing a potential mechanism whereby anti-fVIII antibodies may influence anti-fVIII antibody formation independent of FcγRs, fVIII was also injected into complement component 3 (C3) knockout recipients in parallel. Similar to FcγR knockouts, C3 knockout recipients developed a robust response to fVIII, which was likewise similar to that observed in WT recipients. As FcγRs or C3 may compensate for each other in recipients only deficient in FcγRs or C3 alone, we generated mice deficient in both FcγRs and C3 to test for potential antibody effector redundancy in anti-fVIII antibody formation. Infusion of fVIII into FcγRs and C3 (FcγR × C3) double knockouts likewise induced anti-fVIII antibodies. However, unlike individual knockouts, anti-fVIII antibodies in FcγRs × C3 knockouts were initially lower than WT recipients, although anti-fVIII antibodies increased to WT levels following additional fVIII exposure. In contrast, infusion of RBCs expressing distinct alloantigens into FcγRs, C3 or FcγR × C3 knockout recipients either failed to change anti-RBC levels when compared to WT recipients or actually increased antibody responses, depending on the target antigen. Taken together, these results suggest FcγRs and C3 can differentially impact antibody formation following exposure to distinct alloantigens and that FcγRs and C3 work in concert to facilitate early anti-fVIII antibody formation.

We read with great interest Ranucci et al’s1 review on the “trials and tribulations” of fibrinogen level determination that was recently published in Anesthesia & Analgesia. This topic has become even more important with the rise of the coronavirus pandemic since severe hyperfibrinogenemia is a characteristic finding in patients critically ill with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) respiratory failure.2 We wanted to take this opportunity to bring another limitation of the Clauss method of fibrinogen determination to readers’ attention, as it can have important implications for care of these patients.

Introduction: Frequent and severe bleeding events (SBE) in patients with inherited qualitative platelet disorders Bernard-Soulier Syndrome (BSS) and Glanzmann Thrombasthenia (GT) can lead to secondary iron deficiency anemia (IDA). SBE are primarily treated with platelet transfusions or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) infusions. The impact of IDA on bleeding management and disease outcomes is understudied. Aim: To evaluate bleeding management, outcomes, and any association with IDA in pediatric patients with BSS and GT. Methods: Retrospective chart-review of pediatric patients with BSS or GT followed at a single hemophilia treatment center between 2007 and 2019. Results: We identified 14 patients with BSS (n = 2) or GT (n = 12). Patients received rFVIIa (7%), platelet transfusions (7%), or a combination of both (57%) for SBE. Eleven patients (79%) had IDA requiring oral and/or intravenous iron replacement and 50% required red blood cell transfusions. Due to recurrent SBE and refractory IDA, three patients (21%) received rFVIIa prophylaxis at 90 μg/kilogram 2-3 times/week for ≥15 months. Patients initiated on rFVIIa prophylaxis had a median baseline hemoglobin of 9.8 g/dL (min-max: 8.0–10.7 g/dL) compared to 11.7 g/dL (8.4–13.8 g/dL) for patients treated on-demand. Following initiation of rFVIIa prophylaxis, median hemoglobin and ferritin increased by 1.3 g/dL (0.7–2.5 g/dL) and 14.6 ng/mL (0.2–42.9 ng/mL), respectively, and bleeding rates were reduced by 7–78%. Conclusion: IDA is a known complication of recurrent bleeding events in individuals with inherited bleeding disorders. Routine monitoring for IDA may help improve bleeding management and reduce bleed burden in BSS/GT.

We describe severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG seroprevalence and antigenemia among patients at a medical center in January-March 2021 using residual clinical blood samples. The overall seroprevalences were 17% by infection and 16% by vaccination. Spent or residual samples are a feasible alternative for rapidly estimating seroprevalence or monitoring trends in infection and vaccination.

There is an increasing recognition of association of COVID-19 with a distinct coagulopathy and increased risk of thrombosis. Unfortunately, effective strategies to prevent and treat thrombosis in this patient population remain uncertain. In the setting of a worsening pandemic, there is an urgent need to provide practical guidance to the clinicians on management of the coagulopathy, while waiting for the results from large systematic trials to establish best practices. At our institution, we convened an interdisciplinary group of 25 experts in the field of thrombosis from different medical specialties to review available literature and brainstorm management strategies. The group provided a 3-tiered anticoagulation algorithm for patients with COVID-19 along with a pathway for multidisciplinary review of difficult or refractory cases, which are described in this manuscript. In these unprecedented times where medical decision making is made difficult by both the novelty of the disease and paucity of robust data, clinical algorithms such as the one presented here may prove to be helpful for frontline providers caring for individual patients.

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of retinopathy and its association with systemic morbidity and laboratory indices of coagulation and inflammatory dysfunction in severe COVID-19. Design: Retrospective, observational cohort study. Methods: Adult patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 who underwent ophthalmic examination from April to July 2020 were reviewed. Retinopathy was defined as one of the following: 1) Retinal hemorrhage; 2) Cotton wool spots; 3) Retinal vascular occlusion. We analyzed medical comorbidities, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, clinical outcomes, and laboratory values for their association with retinopathy. Results: Thirty-seven patients with severe COVID-19 were reviewed, the majority of whom were female (n = 23, 62%), Black (n = 26, 69%), and admitted to the intensive care unit (n = 35, 95%). Fourteen patients had retinopathy (38%) with retinal hemorrhage in 7 (19%), cotton wool spots in 8 (22%), and a branch retinal artery occlusion in 1 (3%) patient. Patients with retinopathy had higher SOFA scores than those without retinopathy (8.0 vs. 5.3, p = .03), higher rates of respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and shock requiring vasopressors (p < .01). Peak D-dimer levels were 28,971 ng/mL in patients with retinopathy compared to 12,575 ng/mL in those without retinopathy (p = .03). Peak CRP was higher in patients with cotton wool spots versus those without cotton wool spots (354 mg/dL vs. 268 mg/dL, p = .03). Multivariate logistic regression modeling showed an increased risk of retinopathy with higher peak D-dimers (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01–1.73, p = .04) and male sex (aOR 9.6, 95% CI 1.2–75.5, p = .04). Conclusion: Retinopathy in severe COVID-19 was associated with greater systemic disease morbidity involving multiple organs. Given its association with coagulopathy and inflammation, retinopathy may offer insight into disease pathogenesis in patients with severe COVID-19.

Here, we describe a protocol for cell-based detection of autoantibodies from human plasma and serum samples using a standard flow cytometer. The protocol allows detection of autoantibodies against a wide array of extracellular antigens. Antigen coverage is limited to the cell types tested, and researchers will need to further determine if autoantibody-positive samples correlate with cytotoxic or clinical outcomes. This protocol is less expensive and faster to perform when compared to protein microarrays and requires no prior knowledge of potential targets. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Wong et al. (2021).

Background: Platelet function testing to monitor antiplatelet therapy is important for reducing thromboembolic complications, yet variability across testing methods remains challenging. Here we evaluated the agreement of four different testing platforms used to monitor antiplatelet effects of aspirin (ASA) or P2Y12 inhibitors (P2Y12-I). Methods: Blood and urine specimens from 20 patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy were analyzed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), whole blood aggregometry (WBA), VerifyNow PRUTest and AspirinWorks. Result interpretation based on pre-defined cutoff values was used to calculate raw agreement indices, and Pearson's correlation coefficient determined using individual units of measure. Results: Agreement between LTA and WBA for P2Y12-I-response was 60% (r = 0.65, high-dose ADP; r = 0.75, low-dose ADP). VerifyNow agreed with LTA in 75% (r = 0.86, high-dose ADP; r = 0.75, low-dose ADP) and WBA in 55% (r = 0.57) of cases. Agreement between LTA and WBA for ASA-response was 45% (r = 0.09, high-dose collagen WBA; r = 0.19, low-dose collagen WBA). AspirinWorks agreed with LTA in 60% (r = 0.32) and WBA in 35% (r = 0.02, high-dose collagen WBA; r = 0.08, low-dose collagen WBA) of cases. Conclusions: Overall agreement varied from 35 to 75%. LTA and VerifyNow demonstrated the highest agreement for P2Y12-I-response, followed by moderate agreement between LTA and WBA. LTA and AspirinWorks showed moderate agreement for aspirin response, while WBA showed the weakest agreement with both LTA and AspirinWorks. The results from this study support the continued use of LTA for monitoring dual antiplatelet therapy, with VerifyNow as an appropriate alternative for P2Y12-I-response. Integration of results obtained from these varied testing platforms with patient outcomes remains paramount for future studies.