Emergency Medicine Journal Editorial Boards: Analysis of Gender, H-Index, Publications, Academic Rank, and Leadership Roles

• Type of Material: Article
• Authors: Daria Hutchinson, University of British Columbia; Priya Das, University of Kerala; Michelle Lall, Emory University; Jesse Hill, University of Alberta; Saleh Fares, Zayed Military Hospital; Faisal Khosa, University of British Columbia
• Language: English
• Date: 2021-03-01
• Publisher: WESTJEM
• Publication Version: Final Published Version
• Copyright Statement: © 2021 Hutchinson et al.
• License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
• Final Published Version (URL): http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.11.49122
• Title of Journal or Parent Work: WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
• Volume: 22
• Issue: 2
• Start Page: 353
• End Page: 359
• Keywords: Emergency Medicine; WOMEN; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Science & Technology; REPRESENTATION
• Research Categories: Biology, Bioinformatics; Health Sciences, Dentistry

Abstract

Introduction: Our goal in this study was to determine female representation on editorial boards of high-ranking emergency medicine (EM) journals. In addition, we examined factors associated with gender disparity, including board members' academic rank, departmental leadership position, h-index, total publications, total citations, and total publishing years. Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined EM editorial boards with an impact factor of 1 or greater according to the Clarivate Journal Citations Report for a total of 16 journals. All board members with a doctor of medicine or doctor of osteopathic medicine degree, or international equivalent were included, resulting in 781 included board members. We analyzed board members' gender, academic rank, departmental leadership position, h-index, total publications, total citations, and total publishing years. Results: Gender disparity was clearly notable, with men holding 87.3% (682/781) of physician editorial board positions and women holding 12.7% (99/781) of positions. Only 6.6% (1/15) of included editorial board chiefs were women. Male editorial board members possessed higher h-indices, total citations, and more publishing years than their female counterparts. Male board members held a greater number of departmental leadership positions, as well as higher academic ranks. Conclusion: Significant gender disparity exists on EM editorial boards. Substantial inequalities between men and women board members exist in both the academic and departmental realms. Addressing these inequalities will likely be an integral part of achieving gender parity on editorial boards.