Publication

Convoys of care: Theorizing intersections of formal and informal care

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Candace L. Kemp, Georgia State UniversityMary M. Ball, Georgia State UniversityMolly M Perkins, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0890-4065
Volume
  • 27
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 15
End Page
  • 29
Grant/Funding Information
  • Research reported in this article was supported by the National Institute for Aging at the National Institutes for Health (R01 AG030486-01A1 to M.M.B.), (1R01 AG021183 to M.M.B.), and the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC 756-2005-042 to C.L.K.).
Abstract
  • Although most care to frail elders is provided informally, much of this care is paired with formal care services. Yet, common approaches to conceptualizing the formal–informal intersection often are static, do not consider self-care, and typically do not account for multi-level influences. In response, we introduce the “convoy of care” model as an alternative way to conceptualize the intersection and to theorize connections between care convoy properties and caregiver and recipient outcomes. The model draws on Kahn and Antonucci's (1980) convoy model of social relations, expanding it to include both formal and informal care providers and also incorporates theoretical and conceptual threads from life course, feminist gerontology, social ecology, and symbolic interactionist perspectives. This article synthesizes theoretical and empirical knowledge and demonstrates the convoy of care model in an increasingly popular long-term care setting, assisted living. We conceptualize care convoys as dynamic, evolving, person- and family-specific, and influenced by a host of multi-level factors. Care convoys have implications for older adults’ quality of care and ability to age in place, for job satisfaction and retention among formal caregivers, and for informal caregiver burden. The model moves beyond existing conceptual work to provide a comprehensive, multi-level, multi-factor framework that can be used to inform future research, including research in other care settings, and to spark further theoretical development.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Candace L. Kemp, The Gerontology Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3984, Atlanta, GA 30302-3984; Email: ckemp@gsu.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Education
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items