Publication

Physiologic risk stratification is important to long-term mortality, complications, and readmission in thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    William Jordan Jr, Emory UniversityCastigliano M Bhamidipati, Oregon Health & Science UniversityBeth C Tohill, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZCharee Robe, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZKimberly J Reid, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZNicholas C Eglitis, Oregon Health & Science UniversityMark A Farber, The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillWilliam D Jordan, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-06-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 The Author(s)
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 9
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • 101174
End Page
  • 101174
Abstract
  • Use of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification is important for periprocedural risk stratification. However, the collective effect after adjustment for the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) medical comorbidity grading system on long-term all-cause mortality, complications, and discharge disposition is unknown. We examined these associations in patients after thoracic endograft placement. Data from three thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) trials through 5 years of follow-up were included. Patients with acute complicated type B dissection (n = 50), traumatic transection (n = 101), or descending thoracic aneurysm (n = 66) were analyzed. The patients were stratified into three groups according to the ASA class: I-II, III, and IV. Multivariable proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the effect of ASA class on 5-year mortality, complications, and rehospitalizations after adjustment for SVS risk score and potential confounders. The largest proportion of patients treated by TEVAR across the ASA groups (n = 217) was ASA IV (n = 97; 44.7%; P < .001), followed by ASA III (n = 83; 38.2%) and ASA I-II (n = 37; 17.1%). Among the ASA groups, the ASA I-II patients were, on average, 6 years younger than those with ASA III and 3 years older than those with ASA IV (ASA I-II: age, 54.3 ± 22.0 years; ASA III: age, 60.0 ± 19.7 years; ASA IV: age, 51.0 ± 18.4 years; P = .009). Multivariable adjusted 5-year outcome models showed that ASA class IV, independent of the SVS score, conferred an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-12.25; P = .0239) and complications (HR, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.69-12.13; P = .0027) but not rehospitalization (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.93-3.68; P = .0817) compared with ASA class I-II. Procedural ASA class is associated with long-term outcomes among post-TEVAR patients, independent of the SVS score. The ASA class and SVS score remain important to patient counseling and postoperative outcomes beyond the index operation.
Author Notes
  • Castigliano M. Bhamidipati, DO, PhD, MSc, FACS, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code L353, Portland, OR 97239. Email: bhamidip@ohsu.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items