Publication

Similar stimulus features control visual classification in orangutans and rhesus monkeys

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Rachel F.L. Diamond, Emory UniversityTara S. Stoinski, Zoo AtlantaJennifer L. Mickelberg, Zoo AtlantaBenjamin M. Basile, National Institute of Mental HealthRegina Paxton Gazes, Zoo AtlantaVictoria L. Templer, Providence CollegeRobert Hampton, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-01
Publisher
  • Wiley: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2015 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0022-5002
Volume
  • 105
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 100
End Page
  • 110
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by Zoo Atlanta and by National Science Foundation awards BCS-0745573 and IOS-1146316 to Robert R. Hampton.
Abstract
  • Many species classify images according to visual attributes. In pigeons, local features may disproportionately control classification, whereas in primates global features may exert greater control. In the absence of explicitly comparative studies, in which different species are tested with the same stimuli under similar conditions, it is not possible to determine how much of the variation in the control of classification is due to species differences and how much is due to differences in the stimuli, training, or testing conditions. We tested rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and Pongo abelii) in identical tests in which images were modified to determine which stimulus features controlled classification. Monkeys and orangutans were trained to classify full color images of birds, fish, flowers, and people; they were later given generalization tests in which images were novel, black and white, black and white line drawings, or scrambled. Classification in these primate species was controlled by multiple stimulus attributes, both global and local, and the species behaved similarly.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Rachel F. L. Diamond, Emory University, Department of Psychology, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322. rachel.diamond@emory.edu.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Psychology, Cognitive
  • Biology, Neuroscience

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items