Publication

Distinct clinicopathological features in metanephric adenoma harboring BRAF mutation

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/03/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Anna Caliò, Indiana University School of MedicineJohn N. Eble, Indiana University School of MedicineOndrej Hes, Charles University Hospital PlzeňGuido Martignoni, University of VeronaSaul E. Harari, Indiana University School of MedicineSean R. Williamson, Henry Ford Health SystemMatteo Brunelli, University of VeronaAdeboye Osunkoya, Emory UniversityLisha Wang, University of MichiganEva Comperat, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-SalpêtrièreAntonio Lopez-Beltran, Champalimaud Clinical CenterMingsheng Wang, Indiana University School of MedicineShaobo Zhang, Indiana University School of MedicineKendra L. Curless, Indiana University School of MedicineKristin M. Post, Indiana University School of MedicineHsim-Yee Chang, Indiana University School of MedicineClaudio Luchini, Indiana University School of MedicineLee Ann Baldrige, Indiana University School of MedicineGregory T. MacLennan, Case Western Reserve UniversityRodolfo Montironi, Polytechnic University of The Marche Region (Ancona)David J. Grignon, Indiana University School of MedicineLiang Cheng, Indiana University School of Medicine
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-08-08
Publisher
  • Impact Journals
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 Caliò et al.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1949-2553
Volume
  • 8
Issue
  • 33
Start Page
  • 54096
End Page
  • 54105
Grant/Funding Information
  • No funding information available
Abstract
  • BRAF mutation recently has been reported in metanephric adenoma. We sought to determine the clinical and morphologic features of BRAF-mutated metanephric adenoma and to correlate BRAF mutation with BRAF V600E immunohistochemical staining results. A series of 48 metanephric adenomas and 15 epithelial-predominant nephroblastomas were analyzed for the occurrence of BRAF mutation (BRAF V600E/V600E complex, BRAF V600D, BRAF V600K and BRAF V600R) using the BRAF RGQ PCR kit (Qiagen). Immunohistochemistry was performed using monoclonal mouse antibodies against p16INK4 and VE1 (Spring Bioscience), recognizing the BRAF V600E mutant protein. Forty-one of 48 cases (85%) showed BRAF V600E mutation; none of the other BRAF variants was detected. Of 41 BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas, 33 showed positive VE1 immunostaining (sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%); in all cases we detected p16INK4 expression regardless of BRAF mutation status. All epithelial-predominant nephroblastomas were BRAF-wild-type and none expressed VE1. The following features were associated with BRAF V600E mutation: older patients (p=0.01), female predominance (p=0.005) and the presence of a predominantly acinar architecture (p=0.003). In summary, BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas were associated with older age, female predominance, and the presence of a predominant acinar component. A subset (20%) of BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas was not detected by VE1 immunostaining.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, General
  • Health Sciences, Pathology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items