Publication

ACR Appropriateness Criteria (R) Recurrent Hodgkin Lymphoma

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Karen M. Winkfield, Wake Forest UniversityRanjana H. Advani, Stanford Cancer CenterLeslie K. Ballas, University of Southern CaliforniaBouthaina S. Dabaja, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterSughosh Dhakal, University of RochesterChristopher Flowers, Emory UniversityChristopher R. Ha, University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioBradford S. Hoppe, University of FloridaDavid B. Mansur, Case Western Reserve UniversityNancy P. Mendenhall, University of FloridaMonika L. Metzger, American Society of Clinical OncologyJohn P. Plastaras, University of Pennsylvania Health SystemKenneth B. Roberts, Yale UniversityRonald Shapiro, Indiana UniversitySonali M. Smith, American Society of Clinical OncologyStephanie A. Terezakis, Johns Hopkins UniversityAnas Younes, American Society of Clinical OncologyLouis S. Constine, University of Rochester
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-12-01
Publisher
  • UBM Medica
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2016 UBM Medica.
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 30
Issue
  • 12
Start Page
  • 1099
End Page
  • 1108
Grant/Funding Information
  • None declared
Abstract
  • This topic addresses the management of recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma. While autologous stem cell transplantation may be appropriate for select cases of recurrent disease following comprehensive combined-modality therapy, other options exist for patients treated with lower-dose therapy for early-stage disease. Additionally, innovative targeted therapies provide newer salvage options to consider. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. By combining the most recent medical literature and expert opinion, this revised guideline can aid clinicians in the complex decision-making associated with the management of recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Karen M. Winkfield, MD, PhD, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr, Reston, VA 20191, kwinkfie@wakehealth.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Cell
  • Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Radiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items