Publication

Natural infection by Zika virus but not DNA vaccination consistently elicits antibodies that compete with two potently neutralising monoclonal antibodies targeting distinct epitopes

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Teresa C. Smith, Emory UniversityDaniel Omar Espinoza, Emory UniversityYerun Zhu, Emory UniversityJaime A. Cardona-Ospina, Universitaria Visión de las AméricasNatalie M. Bowman, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillSylvia Becker-Dreps, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNadine Rouphael, Emory UniversityAlfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales, Universitaria Visión de las AméricasFilemon Bucardo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua-LeónSri Edupuganti, Emory UniversityLakshmanane Premkumar, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillMark J. Mulligan, New York UniversityAravinda M. de Silva, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillMatthew Collins, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-11-18
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 98
Start Page
  • 104875
Grant/Funding Information
  • R21 AI129532 (PI: S. Becker-Dreps), CDCBAA 2017-N-18041 (PI: A. M. de Silva), Thrasher Fund (PI: M. H. Collins), K22 AI137306 (PI: M. H. Collins).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background Autochthonous transmission of Zika virus (ZIKV) has been reported in 87 countries since 2015. Although most infections are mild, there is risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Vaccines are urgently needed to prevent Zika, but sufficient understanding of humoral responses and tools to assess ZIKV-specific immunity are lacking. Methods We developed a blockade-of-binding (BOB) ELISA using A9E and G9E, two strongly neutralising ZIKV-specific monoclonal antibodies, which do not react with dengue virus. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis assessed A9E and G9E BOB serodiagnostic performance. BOB was then applied to samples from a surveillance cohort in Risaralda, Colombia, and phase 1 ZIKV vaccine trial samples, comparing results against traditional serologic tests. Findings In the validation sample set (n = 120), A9E BOB has a sensitivity of 93.5% (95% CI: 79.3, 98.9) and specificity 97.8 (95% CI: 92.2, 99.6). G9E BOB had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 89.0, 100.0) and specificity 100% (95% CI: 95.9, 100). Serum from natural infections consistently tested positive in these assays for up to one year, and reactivity tracks well with ZIKV infection status among sera from endemic areas with complicated flavivirus exposures. Interestingly, a leading ZIKV vaccine candidate elicited minimal BOB reactivity despite generating neutralising antibody responses. Interpretation In conclusion, A9E and G9E BOB assays are sensitive and specific assays for detecting antibodies elicited by recent or remote ZIKV infections. Given the additional ability of these BOB assays to detect immune responses that target different epitopes, further development of these assays is well justified for applications including flavivirus surveillance, translational vaccinology research and as potential serologic correlates of protective immunity against Zika.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Immunology
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Biology, Virology
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items