Publication

Evaluating early-life asthma definitions as a marker for subsequent asthma in an electronic medical record setting

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/03/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Audrey Flak Pennington, Emory UniversityMatthew Strickland, Emory UniversityKaren A. Freedle, Emory UniversityMitchel Klein, Emory UniversityCarolyn Drews-Botsch, Emory UniversityCraig Hansen, Kaiser PermanenteLyndsey Darrow, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-09-01
Publisher
  • Wiley: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0905-6157
Volume
  • 27
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • 591
End Page
  • 596
Grant/Funding Information
  • US EPA grant R834799, NIH/NICHD Grant R03HD084884-01, NIH Reproductive, Perinatal, & Pediatric Training Grant T32HD052460.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Case definitions for asthma incidence in early life vary between studies using medical records to define disease. This study assessed the impact of different approaches to using medical records on estimates of asthma incidence by age 3 and determined the validity of early-life asthma case definitions in predicting school-age asthma. Methods: Asthma diagnoses and medications by age 3 were used to classify 7103 children enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Georgia according to 14 definitions of asthma. School-age asthma was defined as an asthma diagnosis between ages 5 and 8. Sensitivity (probability of asthma by age 3 given school-age asthma), specificity (probability of no asthma by age 3 given no school-age asthma), positive and negative predictive values (probability of (no) school-age asthma given (no) asthma by age 3), and likelihood ratios (combining sensitivity and specificity) were used to determine predictive ability. Results: 9.0–35.2% of children were classified as asthmatic by age 3 depending on asthma case definition. Early-life asthma classifications were more specific than sensitive and were better at identifying children who would not have school-age asthma (negative predictive values: 80.7–86.6%) than at predicting children who would have school-age asthma (positive predictive values: 43.5–71.5%). Conclusions: Choice of case definition had a large impact on the estimate of asthma incidence. While ability to predict school-age asthma was limited, several case definitions performed similarly to clinical asthma prediction tools used in previous asthma research (e.g., the Asthma Predictive Index).
Author Notes
  • Corresponding Author: Audrey Flak Pennington, Department of Environmental health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop 1518-002-2BB, Atlanta, GA 30332-4201, Phone: (404) 712-6841, aflak@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, General
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items