Publication

Epidemiology of Pathogenic Enterobacteria in Humans, Livestock, and Peridomestic Rodents in Rural Madagascar

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    DeAnna C. Bublitz, Centre ValBioPatricia C. Wright, Centre ValBioJonathan R. Bodager, Emory UniversityFidisoa T. Rasambainarivo, Centre ValBioJames B. Bliska, Centre ValBioThomas R. Gillespie, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014
Publisher
  • Public Library of Science
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014 Bublitz et al.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1932-6203
Volume
  • 9
Issue
  • 7
Start Page
  • e101456
End Page
  • e101456
Grant/Funding Information
  • Research reported in this publication that was performed by DeAnna Bublitz was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32AI007539 (awarded to James Bliska).
  • This study was supported by the Jim and Robin Herrnstein Foundation, Stony Brook University, and the Emory University Global Health Institute.
Abstract
  • Background Among the families of enteric bacteria are globally important diarrheal agents. Despite their potential for zoonotic and environmental transmission, few studies have examined the epidemiology of these pathogens in rural systems characterized by extensive overlap among humans, domesticated and peridomestic animals. We investigated patterns of infection with Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Salmonella enterica, Vibrio cholerae, and Yersinia spp. (enterocolitica, and pseudotuberculosis) in Southeastern Madagascar where the potential for the aforementioned interactions is high. In this pilot project we conducted surveys to examine behaviors potentially associated with risk of infection and if infection with specific enterobacteria species was associated with diarrheal disease. Methodology/Principal Findings PCR was conducted on DNA from human, livestock, and rodent fecal samples from three villages. Overall, human prevalence was highest (77%), followed by rodents (51%) and livestock (18%). Rodents were ~2.8 times more likely than livestock to carry one of the bacteria. The incidence of individual species varied between villages, with the observation that, E. coli and Shigella spp. were consistently associated with co-infections. As an aggregate, there was a significant risk of infection linked to a water source in one village. Individually, different pathogens were associated with certain behaviors, including: those who had used medication, experienced diarrhea in the past four weeks, or do not use toilets. Conclusions/Significance Different bacteria were associated with an elevated risk of infection for various human activities or characteristics. Certain bacteria may also predispose people to co-infections. These data suggest that a high potential for transmission among these groups, either directly or via contaminated water sources. As these bacteria were most prevalent in humans, it is possible that they are maintained in humans and that transmission to other species is infrequent. Further studies are needed to understand bacterial persistence, transmission dynamics, and associated consequences in this and similar systems.
Author Notes
Research Categories
  • Anthropology, Medical and Forensic
  • Environmental Sciences

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items