Publication

Developmental plasticity of inhibitory circuitry

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Sarah L. Pallas, Georgia State UniversityPeter Wenner, Emory UniversityCarlos Gonzalez Islas, Emory UniversityMichela Fagiolini, RIKEN Brain Science InstituteKhaleel A. Razak, Georgia State UniversityGunsoo Kim, University of PittsburghDan Sanes, New York UniversityBirgit Roerig, Sucampo Pharmaceuticals
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2006-10-11
Publisher
  • Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • Copyright © 2006 Society for Neuroscience.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0888-0395
Volume
  • 26
Issue
  • 41
Start Page
  • 10358
End Page
  • 10361
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS046510 (P.W.), EY12696 (S.L.P.), EY12702 (B.R.), DC006864 (D.S.), DC05202 (to Zoltan Fuzessery), and DC4199 (to Karl Kandler), and National Science Foundation Grants IBN-0078110 (S.L.P.) and IOB-0616097 (P.W.).
Abstract
  • A growing body of evidence suggests that plasticity at GABAergic synapses is of critical importance during development and aging. A balance between excitation and inhibition maintains homeostasis at the neuronal and circuit levels, and inhibitory plasticity can function to drive a perturbed system toward homeostasis. Activity-dependent modification of inhibitory synaptic strength must be non-Hebbian, however, because the interaction between an inhibitory neuron and its target prevents them from firing together. Mechanisms that may underlie inhibitory plasticity will be discussed, including the possibility that it is limited to the early period when GABA/glycine release is excitatory (Ben-Ari, 2002) or that corelease of another substance alters synapses that produce inhibition (Gillespie et al., 2005). Alternatively, inhibitory synapses may decline in strength through long-term depression (Kotak et al., 2001; Chang et al., 2003), or an as-yet undiscovered mechanism may be responsible. Whatever the mechanism, it is clear that inhibitory plasticity plays an important role in activity-dependent modification of developing circuits.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence should be addressed to Sarah L. Pallas, Graduate Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Biology, Georgia State University, 24 Peachtree Center Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30303. spallas@gsu.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Opthamology
  • Biology, Neuroscience

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items