Publication

Lymphadenectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Is There a Therapeutic Benefit?

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Jon M. Gerry, Stanford UniversityThuy B. Tran, Stanford UniversityLauren M. Postlewait, Emory UniversityShishir Maithel, Emory UniversityJason D. Prescott, Johns Hopkins UniversityTracy S. Wang, Medical College of WisconsinJason A. Glenn, Medical College of WisconsinJohn E. Phay, Ohio State UniversityKara Keplinger, Ohio State UniversityRyan C. Fields, Washington UniversityLinda X. Jin, Washington UniversitySharon M. Weber, University of WisconsinAhmed Salem, University of WisconsinJason K. Sicklick, University of California, San DiegoShady Gad, University of California, San DiegoAdam C. Yopp, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterJohn C. Mansour, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterQuan-Yang Duh, University of California, San FranciscoNatalie Seiser, University of California, San FranciscoCarmen C. Solorzano, Vanderbilt UniversityColleen M. Kiernan, Vanderbilt UniversityKonstantinos I. Votanopoulos, Wake Forest UniversityEdward A. Levine, Wake Forest UniversityIoannis Hatzaras, New York UniversityRivfka Shenoy, New York UniversityTimothy M. Pawlik, Johns Hopkins UniversityJeffrey A. Norton, Stanford UniversityGeorge A. Poultsides, Stanford University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-09-02
Publisher
  • Springer Verlag (Germany)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2016 Society of Surgical Oncology.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1068-9265
Volume
  • 23
Issue
  • Suppl 5
Start Page
  • 1
End Page
  • 6
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Lymph node metastasis is an established predictor of poor outcome for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC); however, routine lymphadenectomy during surgical resection of ACC is not widely performed and its therapeutic role remains unclear. Methods: Patients undergoing margin-negative resection for localized ACC were identified from a multi-institutional database. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the surgeon’s effort or not to perform a lymphadenectomy as documented in the operative note. Clinical, pathologic, and outcome data were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Of 120 patients who met inclusion criteria from 1993 to 2014, 32 (27 %) underwent lymphadenectomy. Factors associated with lymphadenectomy were tumor size (12 vs. 9.5 cm; p = .007), palpable mass at presentation (26 vs. 12 %; p = .07), suspicious lymph nodes on preoperative imaging (44 vs. 7 %; p < .001), and need for multivisceral resection (78 vs. 36 %; p <.001). Median number of lymph nodes harvested was higher in the lymphadenectomy group (5.5 vs. 0; p < .001). In-hospital mortality (0 vs. 1.3 %; p =.72) and grade 3/4 complication rates (0 vs. 12 %; p = .061) were not significantly different. Patients who underwent lymphadenectomy had improved overall survival (5-year 76 vs. 59 %; p = .041). The benefit of lymphadenectomy on overall survival persisted on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.17; p = .006) controlling for adverse preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with lymphadenectomy, such as tumor size, palpable mass, irregular tumor edges, suspicious nodes on imaging, and multivisceral resection. Conclusions: In this multicenter study of adrenocortical carcinoma patients undergoing R0 resection, the surgeon’s effort to dissect peritumoral lymph nodes was independently associated with improved overall survival.
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items