Publication

The Referential Montage Inadequately Localizes Corticocortical Evoked Potentials in Stereoelectroencephalography

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 09/19/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Adam Dickey, Emory UniversityAbdulrahman Alwaki, Emory UniversityAmmar Kheder, Emory UniversityJon Willie, Emory UniversityDaniel Drane, Emory UniversityNigel Pedersen, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2022-07-01
Publisher
  • LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 39
Issue
  • 5
Start Page
  • 412
End Page
  • 418
Grant/Funding Information
  • This was work was supported by the T32 NS748019 (ASD), the Woodruff Foundation and K08 NS105929 (NPP), and R01 NS088748 (DLD).
Abstract
  • Purpose:Corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) resulting from single pulse electrical stimulation are increasingly used to understand seizure networks, as well as normal brain connectivity. However, we observed that when using depth electrodes, traditional measures of CCEPs amplitude using a referential montage can be falsely localizing, often to white matter.Methods:We pooled 27 linear electrode arrays targeting the amygdala, hippocampus, or cingulate cortex from eight participants. Using postoperative imaging, we classified contacts as being in gray matter, white matter, or bordering each and measured the amplitude using the root-mean-squared deviation from baseline in a referential, common average, bipolar, or Laplacian montage.Results:Of 27 electrode contacts, 25 (93%) had a significantly higher mean amplitude when in gray matter than in white matter using a Laplacian montage, which was significantly more than the 12 of 27 electrodes (44%) when using a referential montage (P = 0.0003, Fisher exact test). The area under the curve for a receiver operating characteristic classifying contacts as gray or white matter was significantly higher for either the Laplacian (0.79) or the bipolar (0.72) montage when compared with either the common average (0.56) or the referential (0.51) montage (P ≤ 0.005, bootstrap).Conclusions:Both the Laplacian and bipolar montages were superior to the common average or referential montage in localizing CCEPs to gray matter. These montages may be more appropriate for interpreting CCEPs when using depth electrodes than the referential montage, which has typically been used in prior studies of CCEPs with subdural grids.
Author Notes
  • Nigel P. Pedersen, MBBS, 101 Woodruff Circle, WMB 6107, Atlanta, GA, 30322. Email: npeders@emory.edu.Phone: (404) 778-5934
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items