Publication

A Multisite Study of the Clinical Diagnosis of Different Autism Spectrum Disorders

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Catherine Lord, Weill Cornell Medical CollegeEva Petkova, Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryVanessa Hus, University of Michigan Autism and Communication Disorders CenterWeijin Gan, New York UniversityFeihan Lu, New York UniversityDonna M. Martin, University of MichiganOpal Ousley, Emory UniversityLisa Guy, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRaphael Bernier, University of WashingtonJennifer Gerdts, University of WashingtonMolly Algermissen, Columbia UniversityAgnes Whitaker, Columbia UniversityJames S. Sutcliffe, Vanderbilt Kennedy CenterZachary Warren, Vanderbilt UniversityAmi Klin, Emory UniversityCeline Saulnier, Emory UniversityEllen Hanson, Harvard UniversityRachel Hundley, Harvard UniversityJudith Piggot, University of California Los AngelesEric Fombonne, Montreal Children's Hospital
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2012-03-01
Publisher
  • American Medical Association (AMA)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • ©2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0003-990X
Volume
  • 69
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 306
End Page
  • 313
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research was funded by the Simons Foundation and NIMH to CL (R01 MH081873-01A1).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Context: Best-estimate clinical diagnoses of specific autism spectrum disorders (autistic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified, and Asperger syndrome) have been used as the diagnostic gold standard, even when information from standardized instruments is available. Objective: To determine whether the relationships between behavioral phenotypes and clinical diagnoses of different autism spectrum disorders vary across 12 university- based sites. Design: Multisite observational study collecting clinical phenotype data (diagnostic, developmental, and demographic) for genetic research. Classification trees were used to identify characteristics that predicted diagnosis across and within sites. Setting: Participants were recruited through 12 university- based autism service providers into a genetic study of autism. Participants: A total of 2102 probands (1814 male probands) between 4 and 18 years of age (mean [SD] age, 8.93 [3.5] years) who met autism spectrum criteria on the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and who had a clinical diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder. Main Outcome Measure: Best-estimate clinical diagnoses predicted by standardized scores from diagnostic, cognitive, and behavioral measures. Results: Although distributions of scores on standardized measures were similar across sites, significant site differences emerged in best-estimate clinical diagnoses of specific autism spectrum disorders. Relationships between clinical diagnoses and standardized scores, particularly verbal IQ, language level, and core diagnostic features, varied across sites in weighting of information and cutoffs. Conclusions: Clinical distinctions among categorical diagnostic subtypes of autism spectrum disorders were not reliable even across sites with well-documented fidelity using standardized diagnostic instruments. Results support the move from existing subgroupings of autism spectrum disorders to dimensional descriptions of core features of social affect and fixated, repetitive behaviors, together with characteristics such as language level and cognitive function. ©2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Author Notes
  • Catherine Lord, Ph.D. Institute for Brain Development Bard House 21 Bloomingdale Road White Plains, New York 10605-1504.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Psychology, Developmental
  • Health Sciences, Mental Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items