Publication

Quality of Care of the Initial Patient Cohort of the Diabetes Collaborative Registry(®).

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/03/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Suzanne V. Arnold, University of Missouri‐Kansas CityAbhinav Goyal, Emory UniversitySilvio E. Inzucchi, Yale School of MedicineDarren K. McGuire, University of TexasFengming Tang, University of Missouri‐Kansas CitySanjeev N. Mehta, Joslin Diabetes CenterLaurence Sperling, Emory UniversityThomas M. Maddox, Washington UniversityDaniel Einhorn, University of California, San DiegoNathan D. Wong, University of California, IrvineNiklas Hammar, AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden.Peter Fenici, AstraZeneca, Rome, Italy.Kamlesh Khunti, University of LeicesterCarolyn S. P. Lam, Duke‐National University of SingaporeMikhail Kosiborod, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-08-11
Publisher
  • Wiley Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 The Authors.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2047-9980
Volume
  • 6
Issue
  • 8
Grant/Funding Information
  • The Diabetes Collaborative Registry® is funded by AstraZeneca (founding sponsor) and Boehringer Ingelheim.
Abstract
  • BACKGROUND: Although guidelines and performance measures exist for patients with diabetes mellitus, achievement of these metrics is not well known. The Diabetes Collaborative Registry(®) (DCR) was formed to understand the quality of diabetes mellitus care across the primary and specialty care continuum in the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the frequency of achievement of 7 diabetes mellitus-related quality metrics and variability across the Diabetes Collaborative Registry(®) sites. Among 574 972 patients with diabetes mellitus from 259 US practices, median (interquartile range) achievement of the quality metrics across the practices was the following: (1) glycemic control: 19% (5-47); (2) blood pressure control: 80% (67-88); (3) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with coronary artery disease: 62% (51-69); (4) nephropathy screening: 62% (53-71); (5) eye examination: 0.7% (0.0-79); (6) foot examination: 0.0% (0.0-2.3); and (7) tobacco screening/cessation counseling: 86% (80-94). In hierarchical, modified Poisson regression models, there was substantial variability in meeting these metrics across sites, particularly with documentation of glycemic control and eye and foot examinations. There was also notable variation across specialties, with endocrinology practices performing better on glycemic control and diabetes mellitus foot examinations and cardiology practices succeeding more in blood pressure control and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers. CONCLUSIONS: The Diabetes Collaborative Registry(®) was established to document and improve the quality of outpatient diabetes mellitus care. While target achievement of some metrics of cardiovascular risk modification was high, achievement of others was suboptimal and highly variable. This may be attributable to fragmentation of care, lack of ownership among various specialists concerning certain domains of care, incomplete documentation, true gaps in care, or a combination of these factors.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence to: Suzanne V. Arnold, MD, MHA, Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO 64111. E-mail: suz.v.arnold@gmail.com
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, General

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items