Publication

Systolic function as a predictor of mortality and quality of life in long-term survivors with heart failure

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Robert L. McNamara, Yale New Haven HospitalBethany A. Austin, Cleveland Clinic FoundationYongfei Wang, Yale New Haven HospitalGrace L. Smith, Yale UniversityViola Vaccarino, Emory UniversityHarlan M. Krumholz, Yale‐New Haven Hospital
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2008-03-01
Publisher
  • Wiley Open Access: Various Creative Commons Licenses
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0160-9289
Volume
  • 31
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 119
End Page
  • 124
Abstract
  • Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (EF) have been shown to have high mortality rates, comparable to those with reduced EF. Thus, long-term survivors of HF, regardless of ejection fraction, are a select group. Little is known about disease-related quality of life (QOL) and health status in these patients. Hypothesis: Preserved EF in patients with heart failure independently predicts long-term survival, health related quality of life (QOL), or functional status. Methods: The study followed a cohort of 413 patients consecutively hospitalized for HF between March 1996 and September 1998. In July 2005, information was collected about their mortality, health related QOL as defined by disease-specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, and functional decline as defined by limitations in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores. Results: The primary outcomes were mortality, QOL, and functional decline. At follow-up, 8.1 years after enrollment, overall mortality was 76% (314/413). Adjusted forage, gender, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, HF, and respiratory disease, those with decreased ejection fraction (EF < 40%) had higher mortality compared with those with preserved ejection fraction (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42; confidence interval [CI] = 1.13, 1.80, p = 0.003). The KCCQ scores, including Clinical Summary Scores and Symptom Limitation Scores, as well as ADL limitations, were not significantly different in the survivors with preserved or decreased EF. Conclusions: Heart failure patients with preserved EF have a modest survival advantage compared with those with decreased EF, but health related QOL scores and functional decline in survivors are similar regardless of systolic function.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items