Publication
Relationship between Physician-Adjudicated Adverse Events and Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in a Phase II Clinical Trial (NCT01143402) of Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 03/14/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2017-03-01
- Publisher
- Springer Verlag (Germany)
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- ISSN
- 0171-5216
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 3
- Start Page
- 439
- End Page
- 445
- Grant/Funding Information
- This project was sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Financial support was provided by the National Cancer Institute, the Conquer Cancer Foundation, Cycle for Survival, and the Fund for Opthalmic Knowledge, as well as a National Institutes of Health Support Grant (P30CA08748), which provides partial support for the Behavioral Research Methods Core Facility used in conducting this investigation
- Abstract
- Clinical trials commonly use physician-adjudicated adverse event (AE) assessment via the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) for decision-making. Patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data are becoming more frequent in oncology; however, the relationship between physician-adjudicated AE assessment and HRQoL is understudied. Methods: Data from a phase II trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01143402) where patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were randomized to receive selumetinib, an oral MEK inhibitor, or chemotherapy were analyzed. Patients reported HRQoL at baseline, after 1 month, and end of treatment (n = 118), whereas physicians adjudicated AEs via CTCAE. Mean HRQoL scores were compared between patient randomization arms, as well as between those patients who did/did not receive dose modifications. Results: Ninety-four percent had a CTCAE grade ≥1 for at least one treatment-associated AE, with 18% undergoing dose modification due to toxicity. Mean HRQoL scores did not significantly differ at each of the three time points. Patient and physician-adjudicated reports of nausea were significantly correlated at the start (r = 0.31, p < 0.01) and end of treatment (r = 0.42, p < 0.05). There were no significant correlations between need for dose modification and HRQoL scores. Conclusions: Despite the high rate of physician-adjudicated AEs and need for dose modifications with selumetinib, patient-reported HRQoL was not impacted by treatment. Since HRQoL did not differ in the subgroup of patients who received dosage reductions due to AEs, patients may be willing to tolerate select AEs without dose modification (if medically appropriate). More research is needed to determine how to best integrate HRQoL data into clinical trial conduct.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Oncology
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - s8h0w.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-03-08 | Public | Download |