Publication

Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Devarsetty Praveen, George Institute for Global Health IndiaDavid Peiris, University of New South WalesStephen MacMahon, University of New South WalesKishor Mogulluru, George Institute for Global Health IndiaArvind Raghu, University of OxfordAnthony Rodgers, University of New South WalesShailaja Chilappagari, University of New South WalesDorairaj Prabhakaran, Centre for Chronic Disease ControlGari Clifford, Emory UniversityPallab K. Maulik, George Institute for Global Health IndiaEmily Atkins, University of New South WalesRohina Joshi, University of New South WalesStephane Heritier, Monash UniversityStephen Jan, University of New South WalesAnushka Patel, University of New South Wales
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-11-15
Publisher
  • BMC (part of Springer Nature)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2018 The Author(s).
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1471-2458
Volume
  • 18
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 1264
End Page
  • 1264
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was funded by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Global Alliances for Chronic Disease Grant (ID1040147).
  • The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
  • AR is supported by the Wellcome Trust. PM is an Intermediate Career Fellow of The Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance.
  • DPRA is supported by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), DPE is supported by a NHMRC post-doctoral fellowship, and AP and SJ are supported by NHMRC Senior Research Fellowships.
  • RJ is supported by a National Health Foundation Future Leader Fellowship.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Non-optimal blood pressure (BP) levels are a major cause of disease burden globally. We describe current BP and treatment patterns in rural India and compare different approaches to BP lowering in this setting. Methods: All individuals aged ≥40 years from 54 villages in a South Indian district were invited and 62,194 individuals (84%) participated in a cross-sectional study. Individual 10-year absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was estimated using WHO/ISH charts. Using known effects of treatment, proportions of events that would be averted under different paradigms of BP lowering therapy were estimated. Results: After imputation of pre-treatment BP levels for participants on existing treatment, 76·9% (95% confidence interval, 75.7-78.0%), 5·3% (4.9-5.6%), and 17·8% (16.9-18.8%) of individuals had a 10-year CVD risk defined as low (< 20%), intermediate (20-29%), and high (≥30%, established CVD, or BP > 160/100 mmHg), respectively. Compared to the 19.6% (18.4-20.9%) of adults treated with current practice, a slightly higher or similar proportion would be treated using an intermediate (23·2% (22.0-24.3%)) or high (17·9% (16.9-18.8%) risk threshold for instituting BP lowering therapy and this would avert 87·2% (85.8-88.5%) and 62·7% (60.7-64.6%) more CVD events over ten years, respectively. These strategies were highly cost-effective relative to the current practice. Conclusion: In a rural Indian community, a substantial proportion of the population has elevated CVD risk. The more efficient and cost-effective clinical approach to BP lowering is to base treatment decisions on an estimate of an individual's short-term absolute CVD risk rather than with BP based strategy. Clinical trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2013/06/003753, 14 June 2013.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items