Publication

Delayed Stimulus-Specific Improvements in Discourse Following Anomia Treatment Using an Intentional Gesture

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Lori J. P. Altmann, University of FloridaAudrey A. Hazamy, University of FloridaPamela J. Carvajal, University of FloridaMichelle Benjamin, University of FloridaJohn C. Rosenbek, University of FloridaBruce Crosson, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-04-01
Publisher
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1092-4388
Volume
  • 57
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • 439
End Page
  • 454
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was supported by grants # R01DC007387 from the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; and #B6364L from the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service to Bruce Crosson; and by grant # R21AG033284 from the National Institute on Aging to Lori Altmann.
Abstract
  • Purpose: In this study, the authors assessed how the addition of intentional left-hand gestures to an intensive treatment for anomia affects 2 types of discourse: picture description and responses to open-ended questions. Method: Fourteen people with aphasia completed treatment for anomia comprising 30 treatment sessions over 3 weeks. Seven subjects also incorporated intentional left-hand gestures into each treatment trial. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant changes in trained items and improved naming of untrained items but no change in Western Aphasia Battery-Aphasia Quotient (WAB-AQ; Kertesz, 1982) scores. Changes in discourse were limited to the 3-month follow-up assessment. Several discourse measures showed significant improvements in the picture description task and declines during question responses. Additionally, the gesture group produced more words at each assessment, whereas the no gesture group produced fewer words at each assessment. These patterns led to improvements in picture descriptions and minimal declines in question responses in the gesture group. In contrast, the no gesture group showed minimal improvements in picture descriptions and production declines in question responses relative to pretreatment levels. Conclusion: The intensive treatment protocol is a successful method for improving picture naming even of untrained items. Further, the authors conclude that the intentional left-hand gesture contributed significantly to the generalization of treatment to discourse.
Author Notes
  • We thank JoEllen Gilbert, Ceil Brooks, Flo Singletary, Zvinka Zlatar and Stacy Harnish for treatment delivery and assessment data collection.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Speech Pathology
  • Health Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapy

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items