Publication
A Multi-atlas Approach for Active Bone Marrow Sparing Radiation Therapy: Implementation in the NRG-GY006 Trial
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 08/25/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2020-12-01
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 5
- Start Page
- 1240
- End Page
- 1247
- Grant/Funding Information
- This work was supported by National Cancer Institute (NCI) grants to Dr Mell and Dr Moore (1R01CA197059-01), NRG Oncology (U10 CA180822), NRG Operations (U10 CA180868), NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) (UG1CA189867), and Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) (U24CA180803).
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Purpose: Sparing active bone marrow (ABM) can reduce acute hematologic toxicity in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer, but ABM segmentation based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is costly. We sought to develop an atlas-based ABM segmentation method for implementation in a prospective clinical trial. Methods and Materials: A multiatlas was built on a training set of 144 patients and validated in 32 patients from the NRG-GY006 clinical trial. ABM for individual patients was defined as the subvolume of pelvic bone greater than the individual mean standardized uptake value on registered 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT images. Atlas-based and custom ABM segmentations were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to agreement and used to generate ABM-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. Dose-volume metrics and normal tissue complication probabilities of the two approaches were compared using linear regression. Results: Atlas-based ABM volumes (mean [standard deviation], 548.4 [88.3] cm3) were slightly larger than custom ABM volumes (535.1 [93.2] cm3), with a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.73. Total pelvic bone marrow V20 and Dmean were systematically higher and custom ABM V10 was systematically lower with custom-based plans (slope: 1.021 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.005-1.037], 1.014 [95% CI, 1.006-1.022], and 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99], respectively). We found no significant differences between atlas-based and custom-based plans in bowel, rectum, bladder, femoral heads, or target dose-volume metrics. Conclusions: Atlas-based ABM segmentation can reduce pelvic bone marrow dose while achieving comparable target and other normal tissue dosimetry. This approach may allow ABM sparing in settings where PET/CT is unavailable.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - vths7.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-05-13 | Public | Download |