Publication

A Multi-atlas Approach for Active Bone Marrow Sparing Radiation Therapy: Implementation in the NRG-GY006 Trial

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 08/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Tahir Yusufaly, University of California San DiegoAustin Miller, Roswell Park Cancer InstituteAna Medina-Palomo, University of California San DiegoCasey W Williamson, University of California San DiegoNguyen Hannah, IROC Houston QA CenterJessica Lowenstein, IROC Houston QA CenterCharles A Leath, University of Alabama BirminghamYing Xiao, University of PennsylvaniaKevin L Moore, University of California San DiegoKatherine M Moxley, University of OklahomaCarlos M Chevere-Mourino, University of Puerto RicoTony Eng, Emory UniversityTarrick Zaid, Houston Methodist HospitalLoren K Mell, University of California San Diego
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-12-01
Publisher
  • ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 108
Issue
  • 5
Start Page
  • 1240
End Page
  • 1247
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by National Cancer Institute (NCI) grants to Dr Mell and Dr Moore (1R01CA197059-01), NRG Oncology (U10 CA180822), NRG Operations (U10 CA180868), NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) (UG1CA189867), and Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) (U24CA180803).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Purpose: Sparing active bone marrow (ABM) can reduce acute hematologic toxicity in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer, but ABM segmentation based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is costly. We sought to develop an atlas-based ABM segmentation method for implementation in a prospective clinical trial. Methods and Materials: A multiatlas was built on a training set of 144 patients and validated in 32 patients from the NRG-GY006 clinical trial. ABM for individual patients was defined as the subvolume of pelvic bone greater than the individual mean standardized uptake value on registered 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT images. Atlas-based and custom ABM segmentations were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to agreement and used to generate ABM-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. Dose-volume metrics and normal tissue complication probabilities of the two approaches were compared using linear regression. Results: Atlas-based ABM volumes (mean [standard deviation], 548.4 [88.3] cm3) were slightly larger than custom ABM volumes (535.1 [93.2] cm3), with a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.73. Total pelvic bone marrow V20 and Dmean were systematically higher and custom ABM V10 was systematically lower with custom-based plans (slope: 1.021 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.005-1.037], 1.014 [95% CI, 1.006-1.022], and 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99], respectively). We found no significant differences between atlas-based and custom-based plans in bowel, rectum, bladder, femoral heads, or target dose-volume metrics. Conclusions: Atlas-based ABM segmentation can reduce pelvic bone marrow dose while achieving comparable target and other normal tissue dosimetry. This approach may allow ABM sparing in settings where PET/CT is unavailable.
Author Notes
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items