Publication
Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 05/15/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2018-02-01
- Publisher
- Elsevier: 12 months
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- ISSN
- 0190-9622
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Start Page
- 270
- End Page
- +
- Grant/Funding Information
- This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Background: Computer vision may aid in melanoma detection. Objective: We sought to compare melanoma diagnostic accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists using dermoscopic images. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using 100 randomly selected dermoscopic images (50 melanomas, 44 nevi, and 6 lentigines) from an international computer vision melanoma challenge dataset (n = 379), along with individual algorithm results from 25 teams. We used 5 methods (nonlearned and machine learning) to combine individual automated predictions into “fusion” algorithms. In a companion study, 8 dermatologists classified the lesions in the 100 images as either benign or malignant. Results: The average sensitivity and specificity of dermatologists in classification was 82% and 59%. At 82% sensitivity, dermatologist specificity was similar to the top challenge algorithm (59% vs. 62%, P =.68) but lower than the best-performing fusion algorithm (59% vs. 76%, P =.02). Receiver operating characteristic area of the top fusion algorithm was greater than the mean receiver operating characteristic area of dermatologists (0.86 vs. 0.71, P =.001). Limitations: The dataset lacked the full spectrum of skin lesions encountered in clinical practice, particularly banal lesions. Readers and algorithms were not provided clinical data (eg, age or lesion history/symptoms). Results obtained using our study design cannot be extrapolated to clinical practice. Conclusion: Deep learning computer vision systems classified melanoma dermoscopy images with accuracy that exceeded some but not all dermatologists.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- computer algorithm
- MULTICENTER
- CUTANEOUS MELANOMA
- skin cancer
- computer vision
- Dermatology
- reader study
- CANCER
- PERFORMANCE
- Life Sciences & Biomedicine
- CLASSIFICATION
- machine learning
- dermatologist
- Science & Technology
- International Skin Imaging Collaboration
- International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
- SYSTEM
- melanoma
- Research Categories
- Computer Science
- Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - tng58.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-03-24 | Public | Download |