Publication
Lessons From Implementing Ask-Boost-Connect-Discuss, a Peer-Delivered Psychosocial Intervention for Young Mothers Living With HIV in Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 06/25/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2023-10-30
- Publisher
- Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © Laurenzi et al.
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Start Page
- e2300077
- Grant/Funding Information
- This work was supported by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1190719); ELMA Foundation (20-F0013-1); Fogarty International Center (K43TW011434); International AIDS Society CIPHER Fellowship (625-TOS); Oak Foundation (R46194/AA001 and OFIL-20-057); UK Research and Innovation: GCRF Accelerate Hub (Grant Ref: ES/S008101/1); Center for AIDS Research at Emory University (P30AI050409).
- Abstract
- Adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa are at high risk of HIV, unintended pregnancy, and early motherhood. These intersecting risks can adversely affect their developmental trajectories and lifelong well-being. Because young mothers living with HIV in these settings experience high levels of stigma, shame, and isolation, tailored psychosocial intervention approaches for this group are critical yet unavailable. Enlisting young peer supporters may be a promising way to expand the reach of health services and enhance psychosocial well-being. To date, few peer-based interventions have targeted young mothers living with HIV. In 2019–2021, we codeveloped a peer-based, facility-embedded intervention package, Ask-Boost-Connect-Discuss (ABCD), with young peer supporters to address the psychosocial needs of young mothers living with HIV in Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. We then analyzed programmatic data from ABCD to assess the feasibility of using young peers to deliver psychosocial support. Data sources included post-intervention interviews, focus groups, and written feedback from multiple stakeholders (participants, peer supporters, their supervisors, and clinic-based mentors), which were analyzed thematically. We organized our findings according to Bowen et al.'s feasibility framework. Findings spoke to the acceptability, practicality, and integration of the ABCD program. We found that young peer supporters were seen as acceptable program implementers; able to adopt responsive, engaging, and nonjudgmental approaches; and supported through training, technical skills development, and supervision, alongside purposeful facility integration. Importantly, we also found evidence reflecting the roles of demand and adaptation in program delivery (i.e., how peers responded to emerging participant needs or pivoted in their approach based on shifting circumstances). We conclude that considerations of intervention feasibility and/or program fidelity should be attuned to the dynamic qualities of young peer supporters as implementers and should extend beyond standard modes of assessment to consider intervention codevelopment and implementation as an iterative and adaptive process.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Public Health
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - wbkz6.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-06-05 | Public | Download |