Publication

Use of a Molecular Diagnostic Test in AFB Smear Positive Tuberculosis Suspects Greatly Reduces Time to Detection of Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/05/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    N Tukvadze, Natl Ctr TB & Lung DisRussell Ryan Kempker, Emory UniversityI Kalandadze, Natl Ctr TB & Lung DisEkaterina Kurbatova, Emory UniversityMK Leonard, Emory UniversityR Apsindzelashvili, Natl Ctr TB & Lung DisN Bablishvili, Natl Ctr TB & Lung DisM Kipiani, Natl Ctr TB & Lung DisHenry Michael Blumberg, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2012-02-09
Publisher
  • Public Library of Science
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2012 Tukvadze et al.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1932-6203
Volume
  • 7
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • e31563
End Page
  • e31563
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported in part by the NIH Fogarty International Center [D43TW007124 and D43TW007124-06S1], the Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute [NIH/NCRR UL1RR025008], the U.S. Civilian and Research Development Foundation (CRDF GEB2-2935-TB-08), and the Emory Global Health Institute.
Abstract
  • Background: The WHO has recommended the implementation of rapid diagnostic tests to detect and help combat M/XDR tuberculosis (TB). There are limited data on the performance and impact of these tests in field settings. Methods: The performance of the commercially available Genotype MTBDRplus molecular assay was compared to conventional methods including AFB smear, culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) using both an absolute concentration method on Löwenstein-Jensen media and broth-based method using the MGIT 960 system. Sputum specimens were obtained from TB suspects in the country of Georgia who received care through the National TB Program. Results: Among 500 AFB smear-positive sputum specimens, 458 (91.6%) had both a positive sputum culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and a valid MTBDRplus assay result. The MTBDRplus assay detected isoniazid (INH) resistance directly from the sputum specimen in 159 (89.8%) of 177 specimens and MDR-TB in 109 (95.6%) of 114 specimens compared to conventional methods. There was high agreement between the MTBDRplus assay and conventional DST results in detecting MDR-TB (kappa = 0.95, p < 0.01). The most prevalent INH resistance mutation was S315T (78%) in the katG codon and the most common rifampicin resistance mutation was S531L (68%) in the rpoB codon. Among 13 specimens from TB suspects with negative sputum cultures, 7 had a positive MTBDRplus assay (3 with MDR-TB). The time to detection of MDR-TB was significantly less using the MTBDRplus assay (4.2 days) compared to the use of standard phenotypic tests (67.3 days with solid media and 21.6 days with broth-based media). Conclusions: Compared to conventional methods, the MTBDRplus assay had high accuracy and significantly reduced time to detection of MDR-TB in an area with high MDR-TB prevalence. The use of rapid molecular diagnostic tests for TB and drug resistance should increase the proportion of patients promptly placed on appropriate therapy.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, General
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items