Publication

Advances in Neurocognitive Rehabilitation Research From 1992 to 2017: The Ascension of Neural Plasticity

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Bruce Crosson, Emory UniversityBenjamin Hampstead, Emory UniversityLisa C. Krishnamurthy, Georgia State UniversityVenkatagiri Krishnamurthy, Emory UniversityKeith McGregor, Emory UniversityJoe Nocera, Emory UniversitySimone Roberts, Georgia State UniversityAmy Rodriguez, Emory UniversityStella M. Tran, Georgia State University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-11-01
Publisher
  • Taylor & Francis (Routledge): STM, Behavioural Science and Public Health Titles
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 American Psychological Association.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1382-5585
Volume
  • 31
Issue
  • 8
Start Page
  • 900
End Page
  • 920
Grant/Funding Information
  • Work on this review was supported by the VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (grant numbers C9246C, B6364L, E0956W, B8034W, C2238P, IRX001534) and the National Institute for aging (grant number P30AG053760)
Abstract
  • The last 25 years have seen profound changes in neurocognitive rehabilitation that continue to motivate its evolution. Although the concept of nervous system plasticity was discussed by William James (1890), the foundation for experience-based plasticity had not reached the critical empirical mass to seriously impact rehabilitation research until after 1992. The objective of this review is to describe how the emergence of neural plasticity has changed neurocognitive rehabilitation research. Method: The important developments included (a) introduction of a widely available tool that could measure brain plasticity (i.e., functional MRI); (b) development of new structural imaging techniques that could define limits of and opportunities for neural plasticity; (c) deployment of noninvasive brain stimulation to leverage neural plasticity for rehabilitation; (d) growth of a literature indicating that exercise has positively impacts neural plasticity, especially for older persons; and (e) enhancement of neural plasticity by creating interventions that generalize beyond the boundaries of treatment activities. Given the massive literature, each of these areas is developed by example. Results: The expanding influence of neural plasticity has provided new models and tools for neurocognitive rehabilitation in neural injuries and disorders, as well as methods for measuring neural plasticity and predicting its limits and opportunities. Early clinical trials have provided very encouraging results. Conclusion: Now that neural plasticity has gained a firm foothold, it will continue to influence the evolution of neurocognitive rehabilitation research for the next 25 years and advance rehabilitation for neural injuries and disease.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Bruce Crosson, Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation (151R), Atlanta VA Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Rd., Decatur, GA 30033. bruce.crosson@emory.edu.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Neuroscience
  • Psychology, Clinical

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items