Publication

Demographics, bystander CPR, and AED use in out-of-hospital pediatric arrests

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    M. Austin Johnson, Denver Health Medical CenterBrian J.H. Grahan, University of MinnesotaJason S. Haukoos, Denver Health Medical CenterRobert Campbell, Emory UniversityBryan McNally, Emory UniversityComilla Sasson, University of ColoradoDavid E. Slattery, University of Nevada
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-07-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0300-9572
Volume
  • 85
Issue
  • 7
Start Page
  • 920
End Page
  • 926
Grant/Funding Information
  • Supported, in part, by K02HS017526 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Haukoos) and American Heart Association, Emergency Medicine Foundation and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Sasson).
Abstract
  • Background: In 2005 the American Heart Association released guidelines calling for routine use of automated external defibrillators during pediatric out-of-hospital arrest. The goal of this study was to determine if these guidelines are used during resuscitations. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from 29 U.S. cities that participate in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). Patients were included if they were older than 1 year of age and had a documented resuscitation attempt from October 1, 2005 through December 31, 2009 from an arrest presumed to be cardiac in nature. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the associations between age, demographic factors, and AED use. Results: 129 patients were 1-8 years of age (younger children), 88 patients were 9-17 years of age (older children), and 19,338 patients were ≥18 years of age (adults). When compared to adults, younger children were less likely to be found in a shockable rhythm (young children 11.6%, adults 23.7%) and were less likely to have an AED used (young children 16.3%, adults 28.3%). Older children had a similar prevalence of shockable rhythms as adults (31.8%) and AED use (20.5%). A multivariable analysis demonstrated that, when compared to adults, younger children had decreased odds of having an AED used (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.69), but there was no difference in AED use among older children and adults. Conclusions: Young children suffering from presumed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are less likely to have a shockable rhythm when compared to adults, and are less likely to have an AED used during resuscitation.
Author Notes
  • Address correspondence to: M. Austin Johnson MD, PhD., 777 Bannock Street, Mail Code 0108. Denver, CO 80204; Email: m.austin.johnson@gmail.com, (608) 712-7152
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items