Publication

Same-Day Versus Non-Simultaneous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/22/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Mayo ClinicSri Harsha Patlolla, Mayo ClinicMalcolm R. Bell, Mayo ClinicWisit Cheungpasitporn, University of MississippiJohn M. Stulak, Mayo ClinicGregory J. Schears, Mayo ClinicGregory W. Barsness, Mayo ClinicDavid R. Holmes, Mayo Clinic
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-08-12
Publisher
  • MDPI AG
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 9
Issue
  • 8
Grant/Funding Information
  • Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula is supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Grant Number UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used for hemodynamic support for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there are limited data on the outcomes stratified by the timing of initiation of this strategy. Methods: \Adult (>18 years) AMI admissions with IHCA were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (2000–2017) and the timing of ECMO with relation to IHCA was identified. Same-day vs. non-simultaneous ECMO support for IHCA were compared. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, temporal trends, hospitalization costs, and length of stay. Results: Of the 11.6 million AMI admissions, IHCA was noted in 1.5% with 914 (<0.01%) receiving ECMO support. The cohort receiving same-day ECMO (N = 795) was on average female, with lower comorbidity, higher rates of ST-segment-elevation AMI, shockable rhythm, and higher rates of complications. Compared to non-simultaneous ECMO, the same-day ECMO cohort had higher rates of coronary angiography (67.5% vs. 51.3%; p = 0.001) and comparable rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (58.9% vs. 63.9%; p = 0.32). The same-day ECMO cohort had higher in-hospital mortality (63.1% vs. 44.5%; adjusted odds ratio 3.98 (95% confidence interval 2.34–6.77); p < 0.001), shorter length of stay, and lower hospitalization costs. Older age, minority race, non-ST-segment elevation AMI, multiorgan failure, and complications independently predicted higher in-hospital mortality in IHCA complicating AMI. Conclusions: Same-day ECMO support for IHCA was associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared to those receiving non-simultaneous ECMO support. Though ECMO-assisted CPR is being increasingly used, careful candidate selection is key to improving outcomes in this population.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, svalla4@emory.edu, tel. +404-712-2000; Fax: +404-727-6149
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items