Publication

Quality of Antiepileptic Treatment Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries With Epilepsy A Retrospective Claims Data Analysis

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    M Pisu, University of Alabama BirminghamJ Richman, University of Alabama BirminghamLaKendra Piper, Emory UniversityR Martin, University of Alabama BirminghamE Funkhouser, University of Alabama BirminghamC Dai, University of Alabama BirminghamL Juarez, University of Alabama BirminghamJP Szaflarski, University of Alabama BirminghamEdward Faught Jr, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-07-01
Publisher
  • Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0025-7079
Volume
  • 55
Issue
  • 7
Start Page
  • 677
End Page
  • 683
Grant/Funding Information
  • Dr. Szaflarski received funding from UCB Biosciences, Compumedics Neuroscan Inc., SAGE Therapeutics Inc.; had consulting activity for SAGE Therapeutics Inc., Biomedical Systems Inc., Elite Medical Experts LLC
  • The authors are grateful for support from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R01NS080898-01).
Abstract
  • Background: Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EI-AEDs) are not recommended for older adults with epilepsy. Quality Indicator for Epilepsy Treatment 9 (QUIET-9) states that new patients should not receive EI-AEDs as first line of treatment. In light of reported racial/ethnic disparities in epilepsy care, we investigated EI-AED use and QUIET-9 concordance across major racial/ethnic groups of Medicare beneficiaries. Research Design: Retrospective analyses of 2008-2010 Medicare claims for a 5% random sample of beneficiaries 67 years old and above in 2009 augmented for minority representation. Logistic regressions examined QUIET-9 concordance differences by race/ethnicity adjusting for individual, socioeconomic, and geography factors. Subjects: Epilepsy prevalent (≥1 International Classification of Disease-version 9 code 345.x or ≥2 International Classification of Disease-version 9 code 780.3x, ≥1 AED), and new (same as prevalent+no seizure/epilepsy events nor AEDs in 365 d before index event) cases. Measures: Use of EI-AEDs and QUIET-9 concordance (no EI-AEDs for the first 2 AEDs). Results: Cases were 21% white, 58% African American, 12% Hispanic, 6% Asian, 2% American Indian/Alaskan Native. About 65% of prevalent, 43.6% of new cases, used EI-AEDs. QUIET-9 concordance was found for 71% Asian, 65% white, 61% Hispanic, 57% African American, 55% American Indian/Alaskan new cases: racial/ethnic differences were not significant in adjusted model. Beneficiaries without neurology care, in deductible drug benefit phase, or in high poverty areas were less likely to have QUIET-9 concordant care. Conclusions: EI-AED use is high, and concordance with recommendations low, among all racial/ethnic groups of older adults with epilepsy. Potential socioeconomic disparities and drug coverage plans may affect treatment quality and opportunities to live well with epilepsy.
Author Notes
  • Corresponding Author: Maria Pisu, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Preventive Medicine, 1717 11th Ave South, MT 636, Birmingham, AL 35294-4410, Phone: 205-975-7366; Fax: 205-934-7959, mpisu@uab.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items