Publication

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/23/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Sadia H Sarzynski, National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterSarah Warner, National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterJunfeng Sun, National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterRoland Matsouaka, Duke UniversityJohn P Dekker, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, BethesdaAhmed Babiker, Emory UniversityWilly Li, National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterYi Ling Lai, National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterRobert L Danner, National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterVance G Fowler, Duke UniversitySameer S Kadri, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2022-02-01
Publisher
  • OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 9
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • ofab644
End Page
  • ofab644
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was funded in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is considered first-line therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections based on observational data from small studies. Levofloxacin has emerged as a popular alternative due to tolerability concerns related to TMP-SMX. Data comparing levofloxacin to TMP-SMX as targeted therapy are lacking. Methods: Adult inpatient encounters January 2005 through December 2017 with growth of S maltophilia in blood and/or lower respiratory cultures were identified in the Cerner Healthfacts database. Patients included received targeted therapy with either levofloxacin or TMP-SMX. Overlap weighting was used followed by downstream weighted regression. The primary outcome was adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice. The secondary outcome was number of days from index S maltophilia culture to hospital discharge. Results: Among 1581 patients with S maltophilia infections, levofloxacin (n = 823) displayed statistically similar mortality risk (aOR, 0.76 [95% confidence interval {CI},. 58-1.01]; P = .06) compared to TMP-SMX (n = 758). Levofloxacin (vs TMP-SMX) use was associated with a lower aOR of death in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (n = 1452) (aOR, 0.73 [95% CI,. 54-.98]; P = .03) and if initiated empirically (n = 89) (aOR, 0.16 [95% CI,. 03-.95]; P = .04). The levofloxacin cohort had fewer hospital days between index culture collection and discharge (weighted median [interquartile range], 7 [4-13] vs 9 [6-16] days; P < .0001). Conclusions: Based on observational evidence, levofloxacin is a reasonable alternative to TMP-SMX for the treatment of bloodstream and lower respiratory tract infections caused by S maltophilia.
Author Notes
  • Sameer S. Kadri, Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive B10, 2C145, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Email: sameer.kadri@nih.gov
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Pathology
  • Biology, Biostatistics

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items