Publication

Ventilator Triage Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic at US Hospitals Associated With Members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterTyler S. Gibb, Western Michigan UniversityAmy L. McGuire, Baylor College of MedicinePaul Wolpe, Emory UniversityMatthew K. Wynia, University of ColoradoMegan K. Applewhite, Albany Medical CollegeArthur Caplan, New York UniversityDouglas S. Diekema, University of WashingtonD. Micah Hester, University of Arkansas Medical SciencesLisa Soleymani Lehmann, VA New England Healthcare SystemRenee McLeod-Sordjan, Northwell Health SystemTamar Schiff, New York UniversityHolly K. Tabor, Stanford UniversitySarah E. Wieten, Stanford UniversityJason T. Eberl, St. Louis University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-08-04
Publisher
  • AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 American College of Physicians
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 173
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 188
End Page
  • +
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has or threatens to overwhelm health care systems. Many institutions are developing ventilator triage policies. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the development of ventilator triage policies and compare policy content. DESIGN: Survey and mixed-methods content analysis. SETTING: North American hospitals associated with members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. PARTICIPANTS: Program directors. MEASUREMENTS: Characteristics of institutions and policies, including triage criteria and triage committee membership. RESULTS: Sixty-seven program directors responded (response rate, 91.8%); 36 (53.7%) hospitals did not yet have a policy, and 7 (10.4%) hospitals' policies could not be shared. The 29 institutions providing policies were relatively evenly distributed among the 4 U.S. geographic regions (range, 5 to 9 policies per region). Among the 26 unique policies analyzed, 3 (11.3%) were produced by state health departments. The most frequently cited triage criteria were benefit (25 policies [96.2%]), need (14 [53.8%]), age (13 [50.0%]), conservation of resources (10 [38.5%]), and lottery (9 [34.6%]). Twenty-one (80.8%) policies use scoring systems, and 20 of these (95.2%) use a version of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Among the policies that specify the triage team's composition (23 [88.5%]), all require or recommend a physician member, 20 (87.0%) a nurse, 16 (69.6%) an ethicist, 8 (34.8%) a chaplain, and 8 (34.8%) a respiratory therapist. Thirteen (50.0% of all policies) require or recommend that those making triage decisions not be involved in direct patient care, but only 2 (7.7%) require that their decisions be blinded to ethically irrelevant considerations. LIMITATION: The results may not be generalizable to institutions without academic bioethics programs. CONCLUSION: Over one half of respondents did not have ventilator triage policies. Policies have substantial heterogeneity, and many omit guidance on fair implementation.None.
Author Notes
  • Corresponding Author: Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, MD, PhD, Ethics Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, ML 15006, Cincinnati, OH 45229; e-mail, armand.antommaria@chmc.org.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management
  • Biology, Virology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items