Publication
Nivolumab versus investigator's choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 05/21/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2019-09-01
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- 2019
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 96
- Start Page
- 7
- End Page
- 14
- Grant/Funding Information
- Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Brooke Middlebrook, BS, of Evidence Scientific Solutions, funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb. K. J. Harrington acknowledges support from the Royal Marsden/the Institute of Cancer Research, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, and Oracle Cancer Trust. R. L. Ferris is supported by the P50 CA097190-14, P30 CA047904-28, and R01 CA206517 grants. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant P30 CA016672).
- This study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, NJ, USA) and ONO Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Objectives: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus investigator's choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy at primary analysis in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 141) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN post-platinum therapy. In this post hoc analysis, we report efficacy and safety by age. Patients and methods: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 240) or IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab n = 121). The primary endpoint of the trial was OS. For this analysis, outcomes were analyzed by age < 65 and ≥65 years. The data cut-off date was September 2017 (minimum follow-up 24.2 months). Results: At baseline, 68 patients (28.3%) receiving nivolumab and 45 patients (37.2%) receiving IC were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across age groups. OS and tumor response benefits with nivolumab versus IC were maintained regardless of age. The 30-month OS rates of 11.2% (<65 years) and 13.0% (≥65 years) with nivolumab were more than tripled versus corresponding IC rates of 1.4% and 3.3%, respectively. The nivolumab arm had a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events versus IC regardless of age, consistent with the overall patient population. Conclusion: In CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in a higher survival versus IC in patients <65 and ≥65 years, with a manageable safety profile in both age groups. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02105636.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Immunology
- Health Sciences, Oncology
- Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - vrgrv.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-05-07 | Public | Download |