Publication

Nivolumab versus investigator's choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Nabil Saba, Emory UniversityGeorge Blumenschein, MD Anderson Cancer CenterJoel Guigay, Université Côte d’AzurLisa Licitra, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriJerome Fayette, Centre Leon BerardKevin J. Harrington, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustNaomi Kiyota, Kobe University Hospital Cancer CenterMaura L. Gillison, MD Anderson Cancer CenterRobert L. Ferris, University of PittsburghVijayvel Jayaprakash, Bristol-Myers SquibbLi Li, Bristol-Myers SquibbPeter Brossart, University Hospital of Bonn
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-09-01
Publisher
  • ELSEVIER
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • 2019
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 96
Start Page
  • 7
End Page
  • 14
Grant/Funding Information
  • Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Brooke Middlebrook, BS, of Evidence Scientific Solutions, funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb. K. J. Harrington acknowledges support from the Royal Marsden/the Institute of Cancer Research, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, and Oracle Cancer Trust. R. L. Ferris is supported by the P50 CA097190-14, P30 CA047904-28, and R01 CA206517 grants. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant P30 CA016672).
  • This study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, NJ, USA) and ONO Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Objectives: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus investigator's choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy at primary analysis in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 141) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN post-platinum therapy. In this post hoc analysis, we report efficacy and safety by age. Patients and methods: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 240) or IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab n = 121). The primary endpoint of the trial was OS. For this analysis, outcomes were analyzed by age < 65 and ≥65 years. The data cut-off date was September 2017 (minimum follow-up 24.2 months). Results: At baseline, 68 patients (28.3%) receiving nivolumab and 45 patients (37.2%) receiving IC were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across age groups. OS and tumor response benefits with nivolumab versus IC were maintained regardless of age. The 30-month OS rates of 11.2% (<65 years) and 13.0% (≥65 years) with nivolumab were more than tripled versus corresponding IC rates of 1.4% and 3.3%, respectively. The nivolumab arm had a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events versus IC regardless of age, consistent with the overall patient population. Conclusion: In CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in a higher survival versus IC in patients <65 and ≥65 years, with a manageable safety profile in both age groups. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02105636.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Immunology
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items