Publication
Predicting diabetes risk among HIV-positive and HIV-negative women
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 05/21/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2018-11-28
- Publisher
- LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 18
- Start Page
- 2767
- End Page
- 2775
- Grant/Funding Information
- WIHS data collection is also supported by UL1-TR000004 (UCSF CTSA), UL1-TR000454 (Atlanta CTSA), and P30-AI-050410 (UNC CFAR).
- The study was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases through the WIHS (U01AI103408-04). M.K.A. and KIG were partially supported by the Georgia Center for Diabetes Translation Research (P30DK111024).
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Objective:To assess the performance of an adapted American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk score and the concise Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINRISC) for predicting type 2 diabetes development in women with and at risk of HIV infection.Design:Longitudinal analysis of the Women's Interagency HIV Study.Methods:The women's Interagency HIV Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study of women with and at risk for HIV infection. Women without prevalent diabetes and 3-year data on fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, self-reported diabetes medication use, and self-reported diabetes were included. ADA and FINRISC scores were computed at baseline and their ability to predict diabetes development within 3 years was assessed [sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve].Results:A total of 1111 HIV-positive (median age 41, 60% African American) and 454 HIV-negative women (median age 38, 63% African-American) were included. ADA sensitivity did not differ between HIV-positive (77%) and HIV-negative women (81%), while specificity was better in HIV-negative women (42 vs. 49%, P = 0.006). Overall ADA discrimination was suboptimal in both HIV-positive [AUROC = 0.64 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.70)] and HIV-negative women [AUROC = 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.77)]. FINRISC sensitivity and specificity did not differ between HIV-positive (72 and 49%, respectively) and HIV-negative women (86 and 52%, respectively). Overall FINRISC discrimination was suboptimal in HIV-positive [AUROC = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.75)] and HIV-negative women [AUROC = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.90)].Conclusion:Model performance was suboptimal in women with and at risk of HIV, while greater misclassification was generally observed among HIV-positive women. HIV-specific risk factors known to contribute to diabetes risk should be explored in these models.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Biology, Virology
- Health Sciences, Public Health
- Health Sciences, Epidemiology
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - vj6zf.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-04-28 | Public | Download |