Publication

Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Caroline K. Olt, Emory UniversityLucy W. Thuita, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences ClevelandEdward G. Soltesz, Case Western Reserve UniversityMichael Z. Tong, Case Western Reserve UniversityAaron J. Weiss, Cleveland Clinic FoundationKay Kendall, Transplant Center ClevelandJerry D. Estep, Case Western Reserve UniversityEugene H. Blackstone, Case Western Reserve UniversityEileen M. Hsich, Case Western Reserve University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-03-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2021 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 165
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 1111
End Page
  • 1121.e12
Grant/Funding Information
  • Supported by Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic. Dr Hsich is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institute of Health under Award Number HL141892.
Abstract
  • Objective: Left ventricular assist devices require a psychosocial assessment to determine candidacy despite limited data correlating with outcome. Our objective is to determine whether the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant, a tool validated for transplant and widely used by left ventricular assist device programs, predicts left ventricular assist device program hospital readmissions and death. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adults at the Cleveland Clinic with Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores before primary left ventricular assist device program implantation from April 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was unplanned hospital readmissions censored at death, transplantation, and transfer of care. The secondary outcome was death. Results: There were 263 patients in the left ventricular assist device program with a median (Q1, Q3) Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score of 16 (8, 28). During a median follow-up 1.2 years, 56 died, 65 underwent transplantation, and 21 had transferred care. There were 640 unplanned hospital readmissions among 250 patients with at least 1 outpatient visit at our center. In a multivariable analysis, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components but not total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was associated with readmissions. Psychopathology (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-IX) was associated with hemocompatibility (coefficient 0.21 ± standard error 0.11, P =.040) and cardiac (0.15 ± 0.065, P =.02) readmissions. Patient readiness was associated with noncardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-III, 0.24 ± 0.099, P =.016) and cardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-low total, 0.037 ± 0.014, P =.007) readmissions. Poor living environment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant B-VIII) was associated with device-related readmissions (0.83 ± 0.34, P =.014). Death was associated with organic psychopathology or neurocognitive impairment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-X, 0.59 ± 0.21, P =.006). Conclusions: Total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was not associated with left ventricular assist device program readmission or mortality. However, we identified certain Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components that were associated with outcome and could be used to create a left ventricular assist device program specific psychosocial tool.
Author Notes
  • Eileen M. Hsich, MD, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, J3-4, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. hsiche@ccf.org
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items