Publication

Healthcare Access Domains Mediate Racial Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Treatment Quality in a US Patient Cohort: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/17/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Tomi Akinyemiju, Duke UniversityQuan Chen, University of KentuckyLauren E Wilson, Duke UniversityRebecca A Previs, Duke UniversityAshwini Joshi, Duke UniversityMargaret Liang, University of Alabama BirminghamMaria Pisu, University of Alabama BirminghamKevin C Ward, Emory UniversityAndrew Berchuck, Duke UniversityMaria J Schymura, New York State Cancer Registry, Albany NYBin Huang, University of Kentucky
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-01-01
Publisher
  • AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 by the American Association for Cancer Research
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 32
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 74
End Page
  • 81
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (T. Akinyemiju, R37CA233777). R.A. Previs is supported by a grant from the NIH K12 HD103083
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Ovarian cancer survival disparities have persisted for decades, driven by lack of access to quality treatment. We conducted structural equation modeling (SEM) to define latent variables representing three healthcare access (HCA) domains: affordability, availability, and accessibility, and evaluated the direct and indirect associations between race and ovarian cancer treatment mediated through the HCA domains. Methods: Patients with ovarian cancer ages 65 years or older diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were identified from the SEER-Medicare dataset. Generalized SEM was used to estimate latent variables representing HCA domains by race in relation to two measures of ovarian cancer-treatment quality: gynecologic oncology consultation and receipt of any ovarian cancer surgery. Results: A total of 8,987 patients with ovarian cancer were included in the analysis; 7% were Black. The affordability [Ω: 0.876; average variance extracted (AVE) = 0.689], availability (Ω: 0.848; AVE = 0.636), and accessibility (Ω: 0.798; AVE = 0.634) latent variables showed high composite reliability in SEM analysis. Black patients had lower affordability and availability, but higher accessibility compared with non-Black patients. In fully adjusted models, there was no direct effect observed between Black race to receipt of surgery [β: -0.044; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.264 to 0.149]; however, there was an inverse total effect (β: -0.243; 95% CI, -0.079 to -0.011) that was driven by HCA affordability (β: -0.025; 95% CI, -0.036 to -0.013), as well as pathways that included availability and consultation with a gynecologist oncologist. Conclusions: Racial differences in ovarian cancer treatment appear to be driven by latent variables representing healthcare affordability, availability, and accessibility. Impact: Strategies to mitigate disparities in multiple HCA domains will be transformative in advancing equity in cancer treatment.
Author Notes
  • Tomi Akinyemiju, PhD, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, tomi.akinyemiju@duke.edu, Telephone: 919-613-5950
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Biology, Biostatistics
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items