Publication

Cognitive Demands of Lower Paleolithic Toolmaking

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Dietrich Stout, Emory UniversityErin Hecht, Georgia State UniversityNada Khreisheh, Emory UniversityBruce Bradley, University of ExeterThierry Chaminade, Aix Marseille Université
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2015-04-15
Publisher
  • PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2015 Stout et al.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 10
Issue
  • 4
Start Page
  • e0121804
End Page
  • e0121804
Grant/Funding Information
  • Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abstract
  • Stone tools provide some of the most abundant, continuous, and high resolution evidence of behavioral change over human evolution, but their implications for cognitive evolution have remained unclear. We investigated the neurophysiological demands of stone toolmaking by training modern subjects in known Paleolithic methods ("Oldowan", "Acheulean") and collecting structural and functional brain imaging data as they made technical judgments (outcome prediction, strategic appropriateness) about planned actions on partially completed tools. Results show that this task affected neural activity and functional connectivity in dorsal prefrontal cortex, that effect magnitude correlated with the frequency of correct strategic judgments, and that the frequency of correct strategic judgments was predictive of success in Acheulean, but not Oldowan, toolmaking. This corroborates hypothesized cognitive control demands of Acheulean toolmaking, specifically including information monitoring and manipulation functions attributed to the "central executive" of working memory. More broadly, it develops empirical methods for assessing the differential cognitive demands of Paleolithic technologies, and expands the scope of evolutionary hypotheses that can be tested using the available archaeological record.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Psychology, Cognitive
  • Anthropology, Archaeology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items