Publication

Does COVID-19 count?: Defining Criterion A trauma for diagnosing PTSD during a global crisis

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Seth Norrholm, Emory UniversityAlyson Zalta, University of California IrvineLori Zoellner, University of WashingtonAbigail Lott, Emory UniversityMatthew T. Tull, University of ToledoChristopher Reist, VA Long Beach Healthcare SystemPaula P. Schnurr, Department of Veterans AffairsFrank Weathers, Auburn UniversityMatthew J. Friedman, Department of Veterans Affairs
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-09-01
Publisher
  • Wiley
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2021 The Authors. Depression and Anxiety published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 38
Issue
  • 9
Start Page
  • 882
End Page
  • 885
Abstract
  • Introduction: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a globally significant crisis with a rapid spread worldwide, high rates of illness and mortality, a high degree of uncertainty, and a disruption of daily life across the sociodemographic spectrum. The clinically relevant psychological consequences of this catastrophe will be long-lasting and far-reaching. There is an emerging body of empirical literature related to the mental health aspects of this pandemic and this body will likely expand exponentially. The COVID-19 pandemic is an example of a historic catastrophe from which we can learn much and from which the field will need to archive, interpret, and synthesize a multitude of clinical and research observations. Methods: In this commentary, we discuss situations and contexts in which a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may or may not apply within the context of diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria. Results: Our consensus is that a COVID-related event cannot be considered traumatic unless key aspects of DSM-5's PTSD Criterion A have been established for a specific type of COVID-19 event (e.g., acute, life-threatening, and catastrophic). Conclusion: The application of a more liberal interpretation of Criterion A will dilute the PTSD diagnosis, increase heterogeneity, confound case–control research, and create an overall sample pool with varying degrees of risk and vulnerability factors.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Psychology, Behavioral
  • Sociology, Public and Social Welfare
  • Biology, Virology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items