Publication

Peripheral Microvascular Function Reflects Coronary Vascular Function

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Ahmed Al-Badri, Emory UniversityJeong Hwan Kim, Emory UniversityChang Liu, Emory UniversityPuja Mehta, Emory UniversityArshed Quyyumi, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-07-01
Publisher
  • Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2019 American Heart Association, Inc.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 39
Issue
  • 7
Start Page
  • 1492
End Page
  • 1500
Grant/Funding Information
  • Arshed A. Quyyumi is currently supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants 5P01HL101398-02, 1P20HL113451-01, 1R56HL126558-01, 1RF1AG051633-01, R01 NS064162-01, R01 HL89650-01, HL095479-01, 1U10HL110302-01, 1DP3DK094346-01, and 2P01HL086773-06A1.
  • Ahmed Al-Badri is supported by American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship Award Grant (18POST34080330).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background Coronary endothelial dysfunction is a precursor of atherosclerosis and adverse outcomes. Whether endothelial dysfunction is a localized or generalized phenomenon in humans remains uncertain. Objectives We simultaneously measured femoral and coronary vascular function with the hypothesis that peripheral vascular endothelial function will be reflective of coronary endothelial function. Approach and Results Eighty-five subjects underwent coronary angiography for evaluation of chest pain or abnormal stress tests. Endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular function were measured using intra-coronary and intra-femoral infusions of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside, respectively. Coronary flow reserve was assessed using intra-coronary adenosine infusion. Flow velocity was measured in each circulation using a Doppler wire (FloWire, EndoSonics). Coronary vascular resistance (CVR) and femoral vascular resistance (FVR) were calculated as mean arterial pressure (mmHg)/coronary blood flow (ml/min) and mean arterial pressure (mmHg)/femoral average peak velocity (cm/s), respectively. Mean age was 53±11 years, 37% female, 44% hypertensive, 12% diabetic and 38% had obstructive coronary artery disease. There was a correlation between the change in FVR with acetylcholine and acetylcholine-mediated changes in both the CVR (r=0.27; p=0.014) and in the epicardial coronary artery diameter (r=−0.25; p=0.021), indicating that subjects with normal endothelial function in the femoral circulation had normal endothelial function in the coronary epicardial and microcirculation, and vice versa. The coronary vasodilator response to adenosine also correlated with the femoral vasodilatation with acetylcholine (r=0.4; p=0.0002). There was no correlation between the coronary and femoral responses to sodium nitroprusside. Conclusions Endothelial functional changes in the peripheral and coronary circulations were modestly correlated. Thus, peripheral microvascular endothelial function reflects endothelium-dependent coronary epicardial and microvascular function, and the coronary flow reserve.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Arshed A. Quyyumi, MD, FACC Professor of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Rd. NE, Suite 507, Atlanta, GA 30322, Tel: (404) 727-3655, Fax: (404) 712-8785, aquyyum@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Microbiology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Pathology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items