Publication

Better characterization of operation for ulcerative colitis through the National surgical quality improvement program: A 2-year audit of NSQIP-IBD

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 09/04/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Jyotirmay Sharma, Emory UniversityWilliam Y Luo, University of California San DiegoStefan D Holubar, Cleveland ClinicLiliana Bordeianou, Massachusetts General HospitalBard C Cosman, University of California San DiegoRoxanne Hyke, Stanford Health CareEdward C Lee, Albany Medical CenterEvangelos Messaris, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterJulia Saraidaridis, Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterJefferey S Scow, Penn State HealthVirginia Shaffer, Emory UniversityRadhika Smith, Washington UniversityRandolph M Steinhagen, The Mount Sinai HospitalFlorin Vaida, University of California San DiegoSamuel Eisenstein, University of California San Diego
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-01-01
Publisher
  • EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 221
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 174
End Page
  • 182
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Introduction: There is little consensus of quality measurements for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(RPC-IPAA) performed for ulcerative colitis(UC). The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program(NSQIP) cannot accurately classify RPC-IPAA staged approaches. We formed an IBD-surgery registry that added IBD-specific variables to NSQIP to study these staged approaches in greater detail. Methods: We queried our validated database of IBD surgeries across 11 sites in the US from March 2017 to March 2019, containing general NSQIP and IBD-specific perioperative variables. We classified cases into delayed versus immediate pouch construction and looked for independent predictors of pouch delay and postoperative Clavien-Dindo complication severity. Results: 430 patients received index surgery or completed pouches. Among completed pouches, 46(28%) and 118(72%) were immediate and delayed pouches, respectively. Significant predictors for delayed pouch surgery included higher UC surgery volume(p = 0.01) and absence of colonic dysplasia(p = 0.04). Delayed pouch formation did not significantly predict complication severity. Conclusions: Our data allows improved classification of complex operations. Curating disease-specific variables allows for better analysis of predictors of delayed versus immediate pouch construction and postoperative complication severity. Short summary: We applied our previously validated novel NSIP-IBD database for classifying complex, multi-stage surgical approaches for UC to a degree that was not possible prior to our collaborative effort. From this, we describe predictive factors for delayed pouch formation in UC RPC-IPAA with the largest multicenter effort to date.
Author Notes
  • Samuel Eisenstein, MD FACS FASCRS, 3855 Health Sciences Drive #0987, La Jolla, CA 92093-0987, Phone: (858) 822-6277, Fax: (858) 228-1731. Email: seisenstein@health.ucsd.edu
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items