Publication

Measuring Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease in the Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2): A Comparison of Instruments

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 09/04/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Krista L Lanctôt, Sunnybrook Research InstituteRoberta W Scherer, Johns Hopkins UniversityAbby Li, Sunnybrook Research InstituteDanielle Vieira, Sunnybrook Research InstituteHamadou Coulibaly, Johns Hopkins UniversityPaul B Rosenberg, Johns Hopkins UniversityNathan Herrmann, Sunnybrook Research InstituteAlan J Lerner, University Hospital – Case Western Reserve UniversityPrasad R Padala, University of Arkansas for Medical ScienceOlga Brawman-Mintzer, Veterans Administration Medical CenteChris H van Dyck, Yale UniversityAnton P Porsteinsson, University of RochesterSuzanne Craft, Wake Forest University School of MedicineAllan Levey, Emory UniversityWilliam J Burke, Banner Alzheimer’s InstituteJacobo E Mintzer, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Atlanta
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-01-01
Publisher
  • ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 29
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 81
End Page
  • 89
Grant/Funding Information
  • ADMET 2 is funded by NIA, NIH, R01AG046543. The Sponsor had no role in the design of the trial, and is not involved in data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data.
Abstract
  • Background: Diagnostic criteria for apathy have been published but have yet to be evaluated in the context of clinical trials. The Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2) operationalized the diagnostic criteria for apathy (DCA) into a clinician-rated questionnaire informed by interviews with the patient and caregiver. Objective: The goal of the present study was to compare the classification of apathy using the DCA with that using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-apathy (NPI-apathy) subscale in ADMET 2. Comparisons between NPI-Apathy and Dementia Apathy Interview Rating (DAIR) scale, and DCA and DAIR were also explored. Methods: ADMET 2 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial examining the effects of 20 mg/day methylphenidate on symptoms of apathy over 6 months in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Participants scoring at least 4 on the NPI-Apathy were recruited. This analysis focuses on cross-sectional correlations between baseline apathy scale scores using cross-tabulation. Results: Of 180 participants, the median age was 76.5 years and they were predominantly white (92.8%) and male (66.1%). The mean (±standard deviation) scores were 7.7 ± 2.4 on the NPI-apathy, and 1.9 ± 0.5 on the DAIR. Of those with NPI-defined apathy, 169 (93.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.3%–96.9%) met DCA diagnostic criteria. The DCA and DAIR overlapped on apathy diagnosis for 169 participants (93.9%, 95% CI 89.3%–96.9%). Conclusion: The measurements used for the assessment of apathy in patients with AD had a high degree of overlap with the DCA. The NPI-apathy cut-off used to determine apathy in ADMET 2 selects those likely to meet DCA criteria.
Author Notes
  • Krista L. Lanctôt, Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, FG08, Toronto, ON, Canada, M4N 3M5. Phone: 416-480-6100 ext. 2241; fax: 416-480-6022; email: krista.lanctot@sunnybrook.ca
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items