Publication
Measuring Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease in the Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2): A Comparison of Instruments
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 09/04/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2021-01-01
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2020 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Start Page
- 81
- End Page
- 89
- Grant/Funding Information
- ADMET 2 is funded by NIA, NIH, R01AG046543. The Sponsor had no role in the design of the trial, and is not involved in data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data.
- Abstract
- Background: Diagnostic criteria for apathy have been published but have yet to be evaluated in the context of clinical trials. The Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2) operationalized the diagnostic criteria for apathy (DCA) into a clinician-rated questionnaire informed by interviews with the patient and caregiver. Objective: The goal of the present study was to compare the classification of apathy using the DCA with that using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-apathy (NPI-apathy) subscale in ADMET 2. Comparisons between NPI-Apathy and Dementia Apathy Interview Rating (DAIR) scale, and DCA and DAIR were also explored. Methods: ADMET 2 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial examining the effects of 20 mg/day methylphenidate on symptoms of apathy over 6 months in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Participants scoring at least 4 on the NPI-Apathy were recruited. This analysis focuses on cross-sectional correlations between baseline apathy scale scores using cross-tabulation. Results: Of 180 participants, the median age was 76.5 years and they were predominantly white (92.8%) and male (66.1%). The mean (±standard deviation) scores were 7.7 ± 2.4 on the NPI-apathy, and 1.9 ± 0.5 on the DAIR. Of those with NPI-defined apathy, 169 (93.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.3%–96.9%) met DCA diagnostic criteria. The DCA and DAIR overlapped on apathy diagnosis for 169 participants (93.9%, 95% CI 89.3%–96.9%). Conclusion: The measurements used for the assessment of apathy in patients with AD had a high degree of overlap with the DCA. The NPI-apathy cut-off used to determine apathy in ADMET 2 selects those likely to meet DCA criteria.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - vxkbv.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-05-19 | Public | Download |