Publication

International survey of acute Stroke imaging used to make revascularization treatment decisions

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Max Wintermark, Stanford UniversityMarie Luby, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNatan M. Bornstein, Tel Aviv UniversityAndrew Demchuk, University of CalgaryJens Fiehler, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfKohsuke Kudo, Hokkaido University HospitalKennedy R. Lees, University of GlasgowDavid S. Liebeskind, University of California Los AngelesPatrik Michel, University of LausanneRaul Nogueira, Emory UniversityMark W. Parsons, University of NewcastleMakoto Sasaki, Iwate Medical UniversityJoanna M. Wardlaw, University of EdinburghOna Wu, Massachusetts General HospitalWeiwei Zhang, Military General Hospital of Beijing PLAGuangming Zhu, Military General Hospital of Beijing PLASteven J. Warach, Seton/UT Southwestern Clinical Research Institute of Austin
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2015-07-01
Publisher
  • SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2015 World Stroke Organization.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1747-4930
Volume
  • 10
Issue
  • 5
Start Page
  • 759
End Page
  • 762
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background To assess the differences across continental regions in terms of stroke imaging obtained for making acute revascularization therapy decisions, and to identify obstacles to participating in randomized trials involving multimodal imaging. Methods Stroke Imaging Repository (STIR) and Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA)-Imaging circulated an online survey through its website, through the websites of national professional societies from multiple countries as well as through email distribution lists from STIR and the above mentioned societies. Results We received responses from 223 centers (2 from Africa, 38 from Asia, 10 from Australia, 101 from Europe, 4 from Middle East, 55 from North America, 13 from South America). In combination, the sites surveyed administered acute revascularization therapy to a total of 25 326 acute stroke patients in 2012. Seventy-three percent of these patients received intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and 27%, endovascular therapy. Vascular imaging was routinely obtained in 79% (152/193) of sites for endovascular therapy decisions, and also as part of standard IV tPA treatment decisions at 46% (92/198) of sites. Modality, availability and use of acute vascular and perfusion imaging before revascularization varied substantially between geographical areas. The main obstacles to participate in randomized trials involving multimodal imaging included: mainly insufficient research support and staff (50%, 79/158) and infrequent use of multimodal imaging (27%, 43/158). Conclusion There were significant variations among sites and geographical areas in terms of stroke imaging work-up used to make decisions both for intravenous and endovascular revascularization. Clinical trials using advanced imaging as a selection tool for acute revascularization therapy should address the need for additional resources and technical support, and take into consideration the lack of routine use of such techniques in trial planning.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Max Wintermark, Radiology, Neurology, Neurosurgery and Biomedical Engineering; Chief of Neuroradiology, UVA Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. Email: max.wintermark@gmail.com
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Biology, Neuroscience

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items