Publication

Jedi public health: Co-creating an identity-safe culture to promote health equity

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Arline T. Geronimus, University of Michigan School of Public HealthSherman James, Emory UniversityMesmin Destin, Northwestern UniversityLouis F. Graham, University of Massachusetts SystemMark L. Hatzenbuehler, Columbia University in the City of New YorkMary C. Murphy, Indiana UniversityJay A. Pearson, Duke UniversityAmel Omari, University of Michigan School of Public HealthJ. Phillip Thompson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2016-12-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2016 The Authors.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2352-8273
Volume
  • 2
Start Page
  • 105
End Page
  • 116
Grant/Funding Information
  • The authors wish to acknowledge research support from the National Institute of Aging (Grant #s R01 AG032632 and T32 AG00221); from the University of Michigan Centers for: Advancing Research on Societal Solutions; Research on Ethnicity, Culture, and Health; the Population Studies Center and Rackham Deans Strategic Fund; as well as from the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University.
Abstract
  • The extent to which socially-assigned and culturally mediated social identity affects health depends on contingencies of social identity that vary across and within populations in day-to-day life. These contingencies are structurally rooted and health damaging inasmuch as they activate physiological stress responses. They also have adverse effects on cognition and emotion, undermining self-confidence and diminishing academic performance. This impact reduces opportunities for social mobility, while ensuring those who "beat the odds" pay a physical price for their positive efforts. Recent applications of social identity theory toward closing racial, ethnic, and gender academic achievement gaps through changing features of educational settings, rather than individual students, have proved fruitful. We sought to integrate this evidence with growing social epidemiological evidence that structurally-rooted biopsychosocial processes have population health effects. We explicate an emergent framework, Jedi Public Health (JPH). JPH focuses on changing features of settings in everyday life, rather than individuals, to promote population health equity, a high priority, yet, elusive national public health objective. We call for an expansion and, in some ways, a re-orienting of efforts to eliminate population health inequity. Policies and interventions to remove and replace discrediting cues in everyday settings hold promise for disrupting the repeated physiological stress process activation that fuels population health inequities with potentially wide application.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence to: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, United States. Tel.: +1 734 763 2460. arline@umich.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items