Publication

Learning Environments and Evidence-Based Practices in Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering.

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 09/05/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Kristen Billiar, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteDonald P Gaver, III, Tulane University, New OrleansKenneth Barbee, Drexel UniversityAnita Singh, Widener UniversityJohn D DesJardins, Clemson UniversityBeth Pruitt, University of California, Santa BarbaraJoe Tranquillo, Bucknell UniversityGleen Gaudette, Boston College, Chestnut HillBeth Winkelstein, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaLee Makowski, Northeastern UniversityJennifer R Amos, University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignAnn Saterbak, Duke University.Joe LeDoux, Emory UniversityBrian Helmke, University of Virginia, CharlottesvilleMichele Grimm, Michigan State UniversityPaul Benkeser, Emory UniversityLeAnn D Segan, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USABryan Pfister, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyDavid Meaney, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaTreena Arinzeh, New Jersey Institute of TechnologySusan Margulies, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2022-01
Publisher
  • Springer Nature
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2022, The Author(s)
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 2
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 1
End Page
  • 16
Abstract
  • This paper provides a synopsis of discussions related to the Learning Environments track of the Fourth BME Education Summit held at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio in May 2019. This summit was organized by the Council of Chairs of Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering, and participants included over 300 faculty members from 100+ accredited undergraduate programs. The Learning Environments track had six interactive workshops that provided facilitated discussion and provide recommendations in the areas of: (1) Authentic project/problem identification in clinical, industrial, and global settings, (2) Experiential problem/project-based learning within courses, (3) Experiential learning in co-curricular learning settings, (4) Team-based learning, (5) Teaching to reach a diverse classroom, and (6) innovative platforms and pedagogy. A summary of the findings, best practices and recommendations from each of the workshops is provided under separate headings below, and a list of resources is provided at the end of this paper.
Author Notes
  • Donald P. Gaver III, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA. Email: dpg@tulane.edu
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items