Publication

Basic human values drive food choice decision-making in different food environments of Kenya and Tanzania

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Christine E. Blake, University of South CarolinaEva C. Monterrosa, Global Alliance for Improved NutritionKrystal K. Rampalli, University of South CarolinaAbdullah Nurus Salam Khan, University of South CarolinaLigia I. Reyes, Cornell UniversityShiny Deepika Drew, University of South CarolinaPaula Dominguez-Salas, University of GreenwichSalome A. Bukachi, University of NairobiMariah Ngutu, University of NairobiEdward A. Frongillo, University of South CarolinaElyse Iruhiriye, University of South CarolinaAmy Webb Girard, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-09-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 188
Start Page
  • 106620
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research has been funded by the Drivers of Food Choice (DFC) Competitive Grants Programs, funded by the United Kingdom Government's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-008124, and managed by the University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, United States of America.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Increased access to a variety of foods in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) has led to greater autonomy in food choice decision-making. Autonomy allows individuals to make decisions through negotiation of considerations in ways that are consistent with basic values. The aim of this study was to identify and describe how basic human values drive food choice in two diverse populations with transitioning food environments living in the neighboring East African countries of Kenya and Tanzania. Secondary data analysis was carried out on focus group discussions conducted with men and women in Kenya (n = 28) and Tanzania (n = 28) as part of prior studies on food choice. A priori coding based on Schwartz's theory of basic human values was conducted, followed by a narrative comparative analysis, which included review by original principal investigators. Values of conservation (security, conformity, tradition), openness to change (self-directed thought and action, stimulation, indulgence), self-enhancement (achievement, power, face), and self-transcendence (benevolence-dependability and -caring) were prominent drivers of food choice in both settings. Participants described how values were negotiated and highlighted existing tensions. For example, the value of tradition was cited as important in both settings but changing food contexts (e.g., new foods, diverse neighborhoods) increased prioritization of values like stimulation, indulgence, and self-directed thought and action. The application of a basic values framework was useful for understanding food choice in both settings. A focused understanding of how values drive food choice decision-making in the context of changing food availability in LMICs is essential for the promotion of sustainable healthy diets.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Nutrition

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items