Publication

Outcomes of home visits for pregnant mothers and their infants: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Ingrid M. le Roux, Philani Maternal, Child Health and Nutrition ProjectMark Tomlinson, Stellenbosch UniversityJessica M. Harwood, University of California Los AngelesMary J. O'Connor, University of California Los AngelesCarol Worthman, Emory UniversityNokwanele Mbewu, Philani Maternal, Child Health and Nutrition ProjectJacqueline Stewart, Stellenbosch UniversityMary Hartley, Stellenbosch UniversityDallas Swendeman, University of California Los AngelesW. Scott Comulada, University of California Los AngelesRobert E. Weiss, University of California Los AngelesMary Jane Rotheram-Borus, University of California Los Angeles
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-06-01
Publisher
  • Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0269-9370
Volume
  • 27
Issue
  • 9
Start Page
  • 1461
End Page
  • 1471
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was funded by NIAAA Grant # 1R01AA017104 and supported by NIH grants MH58107, 5P30AI028697, and UL1TR000124. Mark Tomlinson is supported by the National Research Foundation (South Africa).
Abstract
  • Objective: To evaluate the effect of home visits by community health workers (CHWs) on maternal and infant well being from pregnancy through the first 6 months of life for women living with HIV (WLH) and all neighborhood mothers. Design and methods: In a cluster randomized controlled trial in Cape Town townships, neighborhoods were randomized within matched pairs to either standard care, comprehensive healthcare at clinics (n = 12 neighborhoods; n = 169 WLH; n = 594 total mothers); or Philani Intervention Program, home visits by CHWs in addition to standard care (PIP; n = 12 neighborhoods; n = 185 WLH; n = 644 total mothers). Participants were assessed during pregnancy (2% refusal) and reassessed at 1 week (92%) and 6 months (88%) postbirth. We analyzed PIP's effect on 28 measures of maternal and infant well being among WLH and among all mothers using random effects regression models. For each group, PIP's overall effectiveness was evaluated using a binomial test for correlated outcomes. Results: Significant overall benefits were found in PIP compared to standard care among WLH and among all participants. Secondarily, compared to standard care, PIP WLH were more likely to complete tasks to prevent vertical transmission, use one feeding method for 6 months, avoid birth-related medical complications, and have infants with healthy height-for-age measurements. Among all mothers, compared to standard care, PIP mothers were more likely to use condoms consistently, breastfeed exclusively for 6 months, and have infants with healthy height-for-age measurements. Conclusion: PIP is a model for countries facing significant reductions in HIV funding whose families face multiple health risks.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items