Publication

In non-severe hemophilia A the risk of inhibitor after intensive factor treatment is greater in older patients: a case-control study

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Christine Kempton, Emory UniversityJohn M. Soucie, Emory UniversityC. H. Miller, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionC. Hooper, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionM. A. Escobar, University of TexasA. J. Cohen, Newark Beth Israel Med. Ctr.N. S. Key, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillA. R. Thompson, Puget Sound Blood CenterT. C. Abshire, BloodCenter of Wisconsin
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2010-10
Publisher
  • Wiley: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2010 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1538-7933
Volume
  • 8
Issue
  • 10
Start Page
  • 2224
End Page
  • 2231
Grant/Funding Information
  • The study was supported by a grant from CSL Behring Foundation for Advancement of Patient Health and the Cooperative Agreement Prevention of Bleeding Disorder Complications through Regional Hemophilia Treatment Centers.
Abstract
  • Summary Background Twenty-five percent of new anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (inhibitors) that complicate hemophilia A occur in those with mild and moderate disease. Although intensive FVIII treatment has long been considered a risk factor for inhibitor development in those with non-severe disease, its strength of association and the influence of other factors have remained undefined. Objective To evaluate risk factors for inhibitor development in patients with non-severe hemophilia A. Methods Information on clinical and demographic variables and FVIII genotype was collected on 36 subjects with mild or moderate hemophilia A and an inhibitor and 62 controls also with mild or moderate hemophilia A but without an inhibitor. Results Treatment with FVIII for six or more consecutive days during the prior year was more strongly associated with inhibitor development in those ≥ 30 years of age compared with those < 30 years of age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 12.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.76–57.81 vs. OR 2.54; 95% CI, 0.61–10.68]. Having previously received < 50 days of FVIII was also not statistically associated with inhibitor development on univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusions These findings suggest that inhibitor development in mild and moderate hemophilia A varies with age, but does not vary significantly with lifetime FVIII exposure days: two features distinct from severe hemophilia A.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Christine L. Kempton, 2015 Uppergate Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Tel.: +1 404 7272846; fax: +1 404 7273681. christine.kempton@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, General

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items