Publication

Uterine artery embolization in Tanzania: a procedure with major public health implications

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Balowa Musa, Muhimbili UniversityJared Mark Alswang, Harvard Medical SchoolRose Di Ioia, Université McGillLydia Grubic, Marian UniversityAzza Naif, Muhimbili National HospitalErick Michael Mbuguje, Muhimbili National HospitalVictoria Vuong, University of California San DiegoJanice Newsome, Emory UniversityBehnam Shaygi, London North West University Healthcare NHS TrustVijay Ramalingam, Harvard Medical SchoolFabian Max Laage Gaupp, Yale School of Medicine
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-12-01
Publisher
  • Springer
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2023
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 6
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 40
End Page
  • 40
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work has received no specific funding. The training program in which this work took place in was supported by the RSNA Research and Education Foundation (#6614).
Abstract
  • Background: The burden of uterine fibroids is substantial in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), with up to 80% of black women harboring them in their lifetime. While uterine artery embolization (UAE) has emerged as an effective alternative to surgery to manage this condition, the procedure is not available to the vast majority of women living in SSA due to limited access to interventional radiology (IR) in the region. One of the few countries in SSA now offering UAE in a public hospital setting is Tanzania. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of UAE in this new environment. Methods: From June 2019 to July 2022, a single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at Tanzania’s first IR service on all patients who underwent UAE for the management of symptomatic fibroids or adenomyosis. Patients were selected for the procedure based on symptom severity, imaging findings, and medical management failure. Procedural technical success and adverse events were recorded for all UAEs. Self-reported symptom severity and volumetric response on imaging were compared between baseline and six-months post-procedure using paired sample t-tests. Results: During the study period, 92.1% (n = 35/38) of patients underwent UAE for the management of symptomatic fibroids and 7.9% (n = 3/38) for adenomyosis. All (n = 38/38) were considered technically successful and one minor adverse event occurred (2.7%). Self-reported symptom-severity scores at six-months post-procedure decreased in all categories: abnormal uterine bleeding from 8.8 to 3.1 (-5.7), pain from 6.7 to 3.2 (-3.5), and bulk symptoms from 2.8 to 1 (-1.8) (p < 0.01). 100% of patients reported satisfaction with outcomes. Among the nine patients with follow-up imaging, there was a mean volumetric decrease of 35.5% (p = 0.109). Conclusions: UAE for fibroids and adenomyosis can be performed with high technical success and low complication rates in a low-resource setting like Tanzania, resulting in significant symptom relief for patients. Building capacity for UAE has major public health implications not only for fibroids and adenomyosis, but can help address the region’s leading cause of maternal mortality, postpartum hemorrhage.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Radiology
  • Health Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items