Publication

Exploratory Factor Analysis of NRG Oncology's University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire-RTOG Modification

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Stephanie L. Pugh, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management CenterGwen Wyatt, Michigan State UniversityRaimond K. W. Wong, McMaster UniversityStephen M. Sagar, McMaster UniversityBevan Yueh, University of MinnesotaAnurag K. Singh, Roswell Park Cancer InstituteMin Yao, Case Western Reserve UniversityPhuc Felix Nguyen-Tan, CHUM-Hôpital Notre-DameSue S. Yom, UCSF Medical CenteFrancis S. Cardinale, Yale UniversityKhalil Sultanem, McGill UniversityD. Ian Hodson, McMaster UniversityGreg A. Krempl, University of OklahomAriel Chavez, John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook CountyAlexander M. Yeh, Indiana University HospitalDeborah W. Bruner, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-01-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0885-3924
Volume
  • 53
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 139
End Page
  • U180
Grant/Funding Information
  • This project was supported by grants U10CA21661 (RTOG-Ops-Stat), U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations), U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC), U10CA37422 (CCOP), UG1CA189867 (NCORP) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Context The 15-item University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire–Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) modification (UW-QOL–RTOG modification) has been used in several trials of head and neck cancer conducted by NRG Oncology such as RTOG 9709, RTOG 9901, RTOG 0244, and RTOG 0537. Objectives This study is an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to establish validity and reliability of the instrument subscales. Methods EFA on the UW-QOL–RTOG modification was conducted using baseline data from NRG Oncology's RTOG 0537, a trial of acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Cronbach α coefficient was calculated to measure reliability; correlation with the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale was used to evaluate concurrent validity; and correlations between consecutive time points were used to assess test-retest reliability. Results The 15-item EFA of the modified tool resulted in 11 items split into four factors: mucus, eating, pain, and activities. Cronbach α ranged from 0.71 to 0.93 for the factors and total score, consisting of all 11 items. There were strong correlations (ρ ≥ 0.60) between consecutive time points and between total score and the Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale total score (ρ  >  0.65). Conclusion The UW-QOL–RTOG modification is a valid tool that can be used to assess symptom burden of head and neck cancer patients receiving radiation therapy or those who have recently completed radiation. The modified tool has acceptable reliability, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability in this patient population, as well as the advantage of having being shortened from 15 to 11 items.
Author Notes
  • Corresponding author: Stephanie Pugh, PhD, 1818 Market Street, Suite 1720, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Tel: 215-574-3226, Fax: 215-928-0153, pughs@nrgoncology.org
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Radiology
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Public Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items