Publication

Contemporary hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume optimization, and endpoints of resuscitation: An AAST critical care committee clinical consensus

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Niels D. Martin, University of PennsylvaniaPanna Codner, Medical College of WisconsinWendy Greene, Emory UniversityKaren Brasel, Oregon Health and Science UniversityChristopher Michetti, Inova Fairfax Medical Center
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-03-10
Publisher
  • BMJ
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 5
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • e000411
End Page
  • e000411
Grant/Funding Information
  • The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Abstract
  • This article, on hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume assessment, and endpoints of resuscitation, is part of a compendium of guidelines provided by the AAST (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) critical care committee. The intention of these guidelines is to inform practitioners with practical clinical guidance. To do this effectively and contemporarily, expert consensus via the critical care committee was obtained. Strict guideline methodology such a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was purposefully NOT used so as not to limit the possible clinical guidance. The critical care committee foresees this methodology as practically valuable to the bedside clinician.
Author Notes
  • Dr Karen Brasel, Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA; kbrasel83@gmail.com
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items