Publication

A Multicenter Analysis of Abnormal Chromosomal Microarray Findings in Congenital Heart Disease

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Benjamin J Landis, Indiana UniversityLindsey R Helvaty, Indiana UniversityGabrielle C Geddes, Indiana UniversityJiuann‐Huey Ivy Lin, University of PittsburghSvetlana A Yatsenko, University of PittsburghCecilia W Lo, University of PittsburghWilliam L Border, Emory UniversityStephanie Burns Wechsler, Emory UniversityChaya N Murali, Baylor College of MedicineMahshid S Azamian, Baylor College of MedicineSeema R Lalani, Baylor College of MedicineRobert B Hinton, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterVidu Garg, Ohio State UniversityKim L McBride, Ohio State UniversityJennelle C Hodge, Indiana UniversityStephanie M Ware, Indiana University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-09-08
Publisher
  • Wiley
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 12
Issue
  • 18
Start Page
  • e029340
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by the American Heart Association Transformational Award AHA 19TPA34850054 (SMW); and National Institutes of Health K23 award HL141667 (BJL).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) provides an opportunity to understand genetic causes of congenital heart disease (CHD). The methods for describing cardiac phenotypes in patients with CMA abnormalities have been inconsistent, which may complicate clinical interpretation of abnormal testing results and hinder a more complete understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships. Methods and Results Patients with CHD and abnormal clinical CMA were accrued from 9 pediatric cardiac centers. Highly detailed cardiac phenotypes were systematically classified and analyzed for their association with CMA abnormality. Hierarchical classification of each patient into 1 CHD category facilitated broad analyses. Inclusive classification allowing multiple CHD types per patient provided sensitive descriptions. In 1363 registry patients, 28% had genomic disorders with well‐recognized CHD association, 67% had clinically reported copy number variants (CNVs) with rare or no prior CHD association, and 5% had regions of homozygosity without CNV. Hierarchical classification identified expected CHD categories in genomic disorders, as well as uncharacteristic CHDs. Inclusive phenotyping provided sensitive descriptions of patients with multiple CHD types, which occurred commonly. Among CNVs with rare or no prior CHD association, submicroscopic CNVs were enriched for more complex types of CHD compared with large CNVs. The submicroscopic CNVs that contained a curated CHD gene were enriched for left ventricular obstruction or septal defects, whereas CNVs containing a single gene were enriched for conotruncal defects. Neuronal‐related pathways were over‐represented in single‐gene CNVs, including top candidate causative genes NRXN3, ADCY2, and HCN1. Conclusions Intensive cardiac phenotyping in multisite registry data identifies genotype–phenotype associations in CHD patients with abnormal CMA.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence to: Stephanie M. Ware, MD, PhD, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1044 West Walnut St, R4‐W227, Indianapolis, IN 46202. Email: stware@iu.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Neuroscience
  • Biology, Genetics
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items