Publication

Comparative Performance Analysis of Intel Xeon Phi, GPU, and CPU: A Case Study from Microscopy Image Analysis

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    George Teodoro, University of BrasiliaTahsin Kurc, Stony Brook UniversityJun Kong, Emory UniversityLee Cooper, Emory UniversityJoel Saltz, Stony Brook University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-01-01
Publisher
  • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers(IEEE)
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014 IEEE.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 2014
Start Page
  • 1063
End Page
  • 1072
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research was supported in part by the NSF through XSEDE resources provided by the XSEDE Science Gateways program; and in part by HHSN261200800001E from the NCI; R24HL085343 from the NHLBI; by R01LM011119-01 and R01LM009239 from the NLM; and RC4MD005964 from the NIH; and CNPq (including projects 151346/2013-5 and 313931/2013-5).
Abstract
  • We study and characterize the performance of operations in an important class of applications on GPUs and Many Integrated Core (MIC) architectures. Our work is motivated by applications that analyze low-dimensional spatial datasets captured by high resolution sensors, such as image datasets obtained from whole slide tissue specimens using microscopy scanners. Common operations in these applications involve the detection and extraction of objects (object segmentation), the computation of features of each extracted object (feature computation), and characterization of objects based on these features (object classification). In this work, we have identify the data access and computation patterns of operations in the object segmentation and feature computation categories. We systematically implement and evaluate the performance of these operations on modern CPUs, GPUs, and MIC systems for a microscopy image analysis application. Our results show that the performance on a MIC of operations that perform regular data access is comparable or sometimes better than that on a GPU. On the other hand, GPUs are significantly more efficient than MICs for operations that access data irregularly. This is a result of the low performance of MICs when it comes to random data access. We also have examined the coordinated use of MICs and CPUs. Our experiments show that using a performance aware task strategy for scheduling application operations improves performance about 1.29× over a first-come-first-served strategy. This allows applications to obtain high performance efficiency on CPU-MIC systems - the example application attained an efficiency of 84% on 192 nodes (3072 CPU cores and 192 MICs).
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Bioinformatics
  • Computer Science

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items